[PATCH] arm: Enable SYS_THUMB_BUILD on AT91
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Fri Nov 17 15:03:14 CET 2023
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 03:49:57PM +0200, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> On 11/17/23 15:46, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 03:45:02PM +0200, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> > > On 11/17/23 15:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 04 Nov 2023 22:27:42 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Several AT91 boards are quite close to their SPL size limit. For example,
> > > > > sama5d27_wlsom1_ek_mmc is just 173 bytes short of its limit and doesn't
> > > > > even fit with older GCCs.
> > > > >
> > > > > All AT91 processors should have thumb support. Enable SYS_THUMB_BUILD. This
> > > > > shrinks SPL by around 30%.
> > > > >
> > > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!
> > > >
> > >
> > > so I'd assume that it would go through at91 tree.
> >
> > Ah, sorry. Since it was blocking two other series from coming in and you
> > had gotten it tested I had assumed I could pull it to -next now to
> > unblock that work.
>
> This is yet another time at91 patches get applied directly. Maybe you do not
> really need an at91 maintainer ?
U-Boot does not tend to have the strict sub-tree breakdown that the
kernel does. Given what happened last time I was hoping that reaching
out and then that you were able to have the changes tested would be
sufficient for changes going to -next, rather than the current release.
In future I will just wait for changes to come via the at91 tree, like I
do for some other areas where the overall custodian prefers to have a
more strict policy. Sorry.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20231117/01ca77ef/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list