[PATCH v2 02/12] cmd: bootefi: re-organize do_bootefi()
AKASHI Takahiro
takahiro.akashi at linaro.org
Tue Nov 21 05:53:15 CET 2023
Hi Heinrich,
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 04:31:40AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 11/21/23 02:29, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Replicate some code and re-organize do_bootefi() into three cases, which
> > will be carved out as independent functions in the next two commits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > cmd/Kconfig | 15 ++++++--
> > cmd/bootefi.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > include/efi_loader.h | 2 --
> > 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/cmd/Kconfig b/cmd/Kconfig
> > index 6f636155e5b6..4cf9a210c4a1 100644
> > --- a/cmd/Kconfig
> > +++ b/cmd/Kconfig
> > @@ -362,9 +362,19 @@ config CMD_BOOTEFI
> > help
> > Boot an EFI image from memory.
> >
> > +if CMD_BOOTEFI
> > +config CMD_BOOTEFI_BINARY
> > + bool "Allow booting an EFI binary directly"
> > + depends on BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR
>
> Why should booting a known binary depend on the boot manager?
Because I tried to maintain the meaning of CONFIG_BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR
at this point of refactoring.
This configuration will eventually be changed to
config CMD_BOOTEFI_BINARY
bool "Allow booting an EFI binary directly"
depends on EFI_BINARY_EXEC
default y
in patch#9.
> > + default y
> > + help
> > + Select this option to enable direct execution of binary at 'bootefi'.
> > + This subcommand will allow you to load the UEFI binary using
> > + other U-Boot commands or external methods and then run it.
> > +
> > config CMD_BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR
> > bool "UEFI Boot Manager command"
> > - depends on BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR && CMD_BOOTEFI
> > + depends on BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR
> > default y
> > help
> > Select this option to enable the 'bootmgr' subcommand of 'bootefi'.
> > @@ -373,7 +383,7 @@ config CMD_BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR
> >
> > config CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO_COMPILE
> > bool "Compile a standard EFI hello world binary for testing"
> > - depends on CMD_BOOTEFI && !CPU_V7M
> > + depends on !CPU_V7M
>
> Why do we have this dependency?
CPU_V7M?
It was introduced in your commit:
---
commit 0ea8741ff65e
Author: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de>
Date: Sun Dec 30 10:11:14 2018 +0100
efi_loader: CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO_COMPILE in configs
---
> EFI_LOADER cannot be selected for SYS_CPU=armv7m.
If not needed, you can delete it, but it is out of scope
of this patch series.
> > default y
> > help
> > This compiles a standard EFI hello world application with U-Boot so
> > @@ -395,6 +405,7 @@ config CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO
> > up EFI support on a new architecture.
> >
> > source lib/efi_selftest/Kconfig
> > +endif
> >
> > config CMD_BOOTMENU
> > bool "bootmenu"
> > diff --git a/cmd/bootefi.c b/cmd/bootefi.c
> > index 190ccba260e0..e9e5ab67a1f5 100644
> > --- a/cmd/bootefi.c
> > +++ b/cmd/bootefi.c
> > @@ -503,7 +503,6 @@ out:
> > return (ret != EFI_SUCCESS) ? ret : ret2;
> > }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST
> > static efi_status_t bootefi_run_prepare(const char *load_options_path,
> > struct efi_device_path *device_path,
> > struct efi_device_path *image_path,
> > @@ -593,7 +592,6 @@ static int do_efi_selftest(void)
> >
> > return ret != EFI_SUCCESS;
> > }
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST */
> >
> > /**
> > * do_bootefi() - execute `bootefi` command
> > @@ -615,14 +613,6 @@ static int do_bootefi(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
> > if (argc < 2)
> > return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> >
> > - /* Initialize EFI drivers */
> > - ret = efi_init_obj_list();
> > - if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> > - log_err("Error: Cannot initialize UEFI sub-system, r = %lu\n",
> > - ret & ~EFI_ERROR_MASK);
> > - return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> > - }
> > -
> > if (argc > 2) {
> > uintptr_t fdt_addr;
> >
> > @@ -631,29 +621,54 @@ static int do_bootefi(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
> > } else {
> > fdt = EFI_FDT_USE_INTERNAL;
> > }
> > - ret = efi_install_fdt(fdt);
> > - if (ret == EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER)
> > - return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> > - else if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > - return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> >
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR)) {
> > - if (!strcmp(argv[1], "bootmgr"))
> > - return do_efibootmgr();
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_BOOTMGR) &&
> > + !strcmp(argv[1], "bootmgr")) {
>
>
> https://docs.u-boot.org/en/latest/develop/commands.html
> suggests to use U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT() to define sub-commands.
As you know, these "if (!strcmp(argv[1], ...)" code exist since
the early days when efi_selftest and bootmgr sub-commands were
introduced in bootefi.
In my personal preference, I would move bootmgr to a new independent
command, efi_selftest to efidebug, leaving only binary-execution
syntax in bootefi.
(So no sub-command.)
>
> > + /* Initialize EFI drivers */
> > + ret = efi_init_obj_list();
>
> We should not duplicate this call for each sub-command.
Please also take a look at the succeeding commits.
A call to efi_init_obj_list() will be included in independent
library functions, either efi_bootmgr_run(), efi_binary_run()
or do_bootefi() (for efi_selftest) so that a caller of these
functions doesn't have to know/care much about detailed APIs.
>
> > + if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> > + log_err("Error: Cannot initialize UEFI sub-system, r = %lu\n",
> > + ret & ~EFI_ERROR_MASK);
> > + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = efi_install_fdt(fdt);
> > + if (ret == EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER)
> > + return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> > + else if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
>
> These lines could be moved into do_efibootmgr.
It will be done in patch#3 when carving out bootmgr specific code.
> Should we move the translations of the return codes into efi_install_fdt?
No, I don't think so. efi_install_fdt() can be called not only from
the command (bootefi) but also from other library code (at least,
efi_bootmgr_run() and efi_binary_run()).
-Takahiro Akashi
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
> > +
> > + return do_efibootmgr();
> > }
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST
> > - if (!strcmp(argv[1], "selftest"))
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST) &&
> > + !strcmp(argv[1], "selftest")) {
> > + /* Initialize EFI drivers */
> > + ret = efi_init_obj_list();
> > + if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> > + log_err("Error: Cannot initialize UEFI sub-system, r = %lu\n",
> > + ret & ~EFI_ERROR_MASK);
> > + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = efi_install_fdt(fdt);
> > + if (ret == EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER)
> > + return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> > + else if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> > +
> > return do_efi_selftest();
> > -#endif
> > + }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO
> > - if (!strcmp(argv[1], "hello")) {
> > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_BINARY))
> > + return CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO) &&
> > + !strcmp(argv[1], "hello")) {
> > image_buf = __efi_helloworld_begin;
> > size = __efi_helloworld_end - __efi_helloworld_begin;
> > efi_clear_bootdev();
> > - } else
> > -#endif
> > - {
> > + } else {
> > addr = strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 16);
> > /* Check that a numeric value was passed */
> > if (!addr)
> > @@ -675,6 +690,21 @@ static int do_bootefi(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
> > size = image_size;
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > + /* Initialize EFI drivers */
> > + ret = efi_init_obj_list();
> > + if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> > + log_err("Error: Cannot initialize UEFI sub-system, r = %lu\n",
> > + ret & ~EFI_ERROR_MASK);
> > + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = efi_install_fdt(fdt);
> > + if (ret == EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER)
> > + return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> > + else if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> > +
> > ret = efi_run_image(image_buf, size);
> >
> > if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > diff --git a/include/efi_loader.h b/include/efi_loader.h
> > index 664dae28f882..44436d346286 100644
> > --- a/include/efi_loader.h
> > +++ b/include/efi_loader.h
> > @@ -879,14 +879,12 @@ efi_status_t __efi_runtime EFIAPI efi_get_time(
> >
> > efi_status_t __efi_runtime EFIAPI efi_set_time(struct efi_time *time);
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST
> > /*
> > * Entry point for the tests of the EFI API.
> > * It is called by 'bootefi selftest'
> > */
> > efi_status_t EFIAPI efi_selftest(efi_handle_t image_handle,
> > struct efi_system_table *systab);
> > -#endif
> >
> > efi_status_t EFIAPI efi_get_variable(u16 *variable_name,
> > const efi_guid_t *vendor, u32 *attributes,
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list