[PATHv11 33/43] configs/am335x_evm_defconfig: inc SPL size
Maxim Uvarov
maxim.uvarov at linaro.org
Mon Nov 27 15:06:23 CET 2023
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 19:08, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 06:57:16PM +0600, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>
> > Increase allowed binary size to fit lwip code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > configs/am335x_evm_defconfig | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/configs/am335x_evm_defconfig b/configs/am335x_evm_defconfig
> > index f048e60f7f..9fd608bd76 100644
> > --- a/configs/am335x_evm_defconfig
> > +++ b/configs/am335x_evm_defconfig
> > @@ -124,3 +124,4 @@ CONFIG_WDT=y
> > CONFIG_DYNAMIC_CRC_TABLE=y
> > CONFIG_RSA=y
> > CONFIG_LZO=y
> > +CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE=0x29000
>
> As probably a problem for other platforms you made this change on too,
> you can't do this. The link limit is here because that's the limit the
> hardware (and ROM) imposes.
>
> You might need to either:
> - Figure out how to make lwip even tinier for the SPL case
> - Limit the old network stack to just for SPL, and a later task is to
> reduce what's in the old stack to just what's also needed within SPL.
>
>
Thanks Tom. All these size changes need to be reviewed. Some of them are
ok, I think like for x86 or qemu virt, but some of them might not work.
Question - Do we need networking inside SPL rather than in the main binary?
Is it a real use case?
BR,
Maxim.
> --
> Tom
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list