bootstd: Scanning for USB bootflow will remove existing SCSI bootflow

[Simon Glass]

Hi Tony,

On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 13:40, Tony Dinh <mibodhi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 4:37 AM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tony,
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Sept 2023 at 14:02, Tony Dinh <mibodhi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Simon,
> > >
> > > Here is an observation during testing the bootflow command.
> > >
> > > If there is a SCSI bootflow, scanning for USB bootflow will remove that existing
> > > SCSI bootflow. To bring it back, I scanned for SCSI bootflow again, and it was
> > > back to normal. Perhaps there is some kind of indexing problem?
> >
> > Yes that's right. The 'botflow scan' command is not additive. The
> > first thing it does is removing existing bootflows.
>
> Thanks for clarifying that. I assumed it is additive, because the
> existing USB bootflow was not removed when I did a "bootflow scan
> scsi" immediately after (see the end of the log).

Yes, but I'm not sure what is going on there. Perhaps it is a bug?
When you scan SCSI it should not also scan USB.

Regards,
SImon