[RFC PATCH v2 2/8] binman: ti-secure: Add support for firewalling entities
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Wed Oct 4 04:11:00 CEST 2023
Hi Manorit,
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 05:21, Manorit Chawdhry <m-chawdhry at ti.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 19:17-20231001, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Manorit,
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 01:58, Manorit Chawdhry <m-chawdhry at ti.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > We can now firewall entities while loading them through our secure
> > > entity TIFS, the required information should be present in the
> > > certificate that is being parsed by TIFS.
> > >
> > > The following commit adds the support to enable the certificates to be
> > > generated if the firewall configurations are present in the binman dtsi
> > > nodes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Manorit Chawdhry <m-chawdhry at ti.com>
> > > ---
> > > tools/binman/btool/openssl.py | 16 +++++++-
> > > tools/binman/etype/ti_secure.py | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > tools/binman/etype/x509_cert.py | 3 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > Please do check that you have 100% test coverage here (binman test -T)
> >
>
> Name Stmts Miss Cover
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [snip]
> tools/binman/btool/openssl.py 42 0 100%
> tools/binman/etype/ti_secure.py 57 0 100%
> tools/binman/etype/x509_cert.py 70 0 100%
> [snip]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> TOTAL 5588 134 98%
>
> I did check that, did you notice something else that I might've missed?
> I just checked for the files that I have changed, I am not sure if there
> are any dependencies that I also have to keep in mind. Do let me know if
> I missed something.
Yes it seems to be a problem with a Xilinx tool. I sent an email about
it, so don't worry about this.
Regards,
iSimon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list