[PATCH 07/25] tegra: Change #ifdef for nop
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Sun Oct 8 01:10:08 CEST 2023
Hi Tom.
On Sun, 24 Sept 2023 at 18:43, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 02:39:25PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > This code is normally compiled for Tegra, but sandbox can also compile
> > it. We should not use UNIT_TEST as a synonym for SANDBOX, since it is
> > possible to disable UNIT_TEST for sandbox.
> >
> > Correct the condition.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > include/k210/pll.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/k210/pll.h b/include/k210/pll.h
> > index fd16a89cb203..6dd60b2eb4fc 100644
> > --- a/include/k210/pll.h
> > +++ b/include/k210/pll.h
> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ struct k210_pll_config {
> > u8 od;
> > };
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_UNIT_TEST
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SANDBOX
> > TEST_STATIC int k210_pll_calc_config(u32 rate, u32 rate_in,
> > struct k210_pll_config *best);
> > #ifndef nop
>
> Tegra? Do you mean sifive? That's where CLK_K210 stuff is... but it
Oh yes, I got confused.
> also seems wrong, you can run unit test on real hardware, and this is a
> test that could (should?) be run on that platform.
Only if it enables UNIT_TEST. You cannot run unit tests without that.
The current tests are designed for sandbox.
>
> --
> Tom
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list