[PATCH 0/3] Revert HAFDBS changes
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Fri Oct 27 19:22:37 CEST 2023
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Pierre-Clément Tosi wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 01:23:51PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> > As discussed this series reverts the HAFDBS changes that caused an issue
> > on AC5/AC5X. I think there are some improvements that can be made to the
> > initial memory map for the AC5/AC5X but so far nothing I've found makes
> > it compatible with the HAFDBS changes.
>
> Would you mind briefly explaining what those issues are and/or point me to the
> discussion where it was decided to revert these patches?
>
> The feature is quite useful for users of CONFIG_CMO_BY_VA_ONLY, to speed up the
> boot sequence: instead of reverting these patches altogether, would a reasonable
> alternative be to put them behind a build option?
>
> Also, could you confirm that the "initial memory map" you are referring to above
> only describes actual memory as, IIRC, some boards were using mappings **much**
> larger than their DRAM address space?
The most details are in this thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/CAFOYHZC_Dveax85n0fLr5BFyZcLqsvUssn=J0oHyvN75bTaCUw@mail.gmail.com/
with some follow-up in:
https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/CAFOYHZB7jJWwD24oWzx6u55w2whHYjK56f=QyN0LWU4Z8dSP+Q@mail.gmail.com/
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20231027/2679fbda/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list