Pull request for tpm-next-27102023
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Sat Oct 28 02:51:02 CEST 2023
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:26:16PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> The following changes since commit e29b932aa07fa0226d325b35d96cd4eea0370129:
>
> Merge branch '2023-09-30-Kconfig-updates' into next (2023-10-01 11:54:31 -0400)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-tpm/ tags/tpm-next-27102023
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 4fd7d27ccb763ce8b836a0e4c5dd005392d38e18:
>
> test/py: always use autostart on tpm2 selftests (2023-10-27 13:17:21 +0300)
>
> The pipeline https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-tpm/-/pipelines/18327
> showed had no red lights.
Heinrich, I see that the docs job passed. But I see:
+++ b/doc/usage/measured_boot.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+
+Measured Boot
+=====================
And was expecting htmldocs to complain and fail. It does neither (and
did neither locally which I believe is a regression in the doc building
side of things.
> Heinrich I did not ignore your reports and I agree with both of your
> observations. The doc needs to mention EFI and the DT Kconfig options
> can be squashed in the future. However this is a big patchset with
> a time consuming test procedure. The changes you requested are
> trivial and we can send them later. I hope that's fine.
>
> Simon there's one patch you haven't acked/reviewed yet, but I've
> responded to your concerns in the ML.
> The response is here
> https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/CAC_iWjJL_taKWWEi4kancnQ6Dsg1V5+4hMSvTifcdr_aCH-Ykg@mail.gmail.com/
>
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20231027/484d8d9e/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list