[PATCH 1/1] clk: sifive: append missing \n to messages
Sean Anderson
seanga2 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 11 15:14:19 CEST 2024
On 4/11/24 04:37, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 11.04.24 05:13, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 2/16/24 11:35, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> If multiple messages are written, line-feeds improve the readability.
>>>
>>> Fixes: c40b6df87fc0 ("clk: Add SiFive FU540 PRCI clock driver")
>>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c b/drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c
>>> index a3cb109d357..537c696b727 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c
>>> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static int __wrpll_calc_filter_range(unsigned long post_divr_freq)
>>> {
>>> if (post_divr_freq < MIN_POST_DIVR_FREQ ||
>>> post_divr_freq > MAX_POST_DIVR_FREQ) {
>>> - WARN(1, "%s: post-divider reference freq out of range: %lu",
>>> + WARN(1, "%s: post-divider reference freq out of range: %lu\n",
>>> __func__, post_divr_freq);
>>> return -ERANGE;
>>> }
>>> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ int wrpll_configure_for_rate(struct wrpll_cfg *c, u32 target_rate,
>>> int range;
>>> if (c->flags == 0) {
>>> - WARN(1, "%s called with uninitialized PLL config", __func__);
>>> + WARN(1, "%s called with uninitialized PLL config\n", __func__);
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ unsigned long wrpll_calc_output_rate(const struct wrpll_cfg *c,
>>> u64 n;
>>> if (c->flags & WRPLL_FLAGS_EXT_FEEDBACK_MASK) {
>>> - WARN(1, "external feedback mode not yet supported");
>>> + WARN(1, "external feedback mode not yet supported\n");
>>> return ULONG_MAX;
>>> }
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2 at gmail.com>
>>
>> But maybe these should be dev_dbg?
>
> The messages look like indicating misconfiguration. So the user should see these.
Yeah, but we already return an error. So the user will notice.
> The kernel code also uses WARN() (and also lacks the line-feeds).
In the kernel there are no size restrictions, so it is fine to include messages.
--Sean
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list