[PATCH 00/23] [RFC] Integrate MbedTLS v3.6 LTS with U-Boot
Raymond Mao
raymond.mao at linaro.org
Wed Apr 17 01:47:44 CEST 2024
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 19:12, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:59:56AM -0700, Raymond Mao wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > [1]: bloat-o-meter output between disabling/enabling MbedTLS
> > ```
> > add/remove: 231/69 grow/shrink: 12/5 up/down: 60196/-11166 (49030)
>
> I don't know if this is qemu_arm64 or sandbox. With buildman's size
> comparison functions we see:
> qemu_arm64 : all +75537 bss -88 data +24 rodata +6349 text
> +69252
> u-boot: add: 274/-12, grow: 12/-4 bytes: 72002/-3800 (68202)
> ...
> sandbox : all +57008 bss +32 data +1632 rodata +352
> text +54992
> u-boot: add: 143/-75, grow: 21/-18 bytes: 64058/-16523
> (47535)
>
> So please look in to using buildman to get more details about what's
> changing, size-wise. Also, my goodness, that's far too much growth, and
> we aren't removing anything? This needs to be a whole switch, not just
> an addition. And then look in to what we can tweak / remove. Are we
> perhaps not getting our usual link time garbage collection done?
>
As stated in the cover letter, with this patch set, we still build the
original libs
(lib/rsa, lib/asn1_decoder.c, lib/crypto/rsa_helper.c, lib/md5.c,
lib/sha1.c,
lib/sha256.c, lib/sha512.c) for the components outside of EFI loader.
Eventually all these will be completely switched and removed.
But I think we should do this in a sparated patch set - It is too big for
one
patch set.
So, as the first patch set, this one will introduce MbedTLS and enable it
with
EFI loader, after they are merged, the next patch set will switch other
components
to use MbedTLS and remove the original libs.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks and regards,
Raymond
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list