[PATCH v2 1/6] mtd: ubi: Do not zero out EC and VID on ECC-ed NOR flashes

[Pratyush Yadav]

On Thu, Apr 25 2024, tkuw584924 at gmail.com wrote:

> From: Takahiro Kuwano <Takahiro.Kuwano at infineon.com>

I wonder how authorship should work for such patches. Patches 1, 2, and
6 in this series are very close to what my patches did for Linux. So I
wonder who should get authorship in this case: the person porting the
patch or the person who wrote the original one. Same for patch 5 but
that is still a little more changed from its Linux counterpart.

>
> For NOR flashes EC and VID are zeroed out before an erase is issued to
> make sure UBI does not mistakenly treat the PEB as used and associate it
> with an LEB.
>
> But on some flashes, like the Infineon Semper NOR flash family,
> multi-pass page programming is not allowed on the default ECC scheme.
> This means zeroing out these magic numbers will result in the flash
> throwing a page programming error.
>
> Do not zero out EC and VID for such flashes. A writesize > 1 is an
> indication of an ECC-ed flash.
>
> This patch replicates the following upstream linux commit:
> f669e74be820 ("ubi: Do not zero out EC and VID on ECC-ed NOR flashes")
>
> Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Takahiro Kuwano <Takahiro.Kuwano at infineon.com>

Apart from my comment above,

Acked-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush at kernel.org>

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav