[PATCH 09/10] Fix efi_bind_block.

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Tue Dec 10 17:17:26 CET 2024


Hi Heinrich,

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 01:50, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On 23.11.24 20:55, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > From: Janis Danisevskis <jdanisevskis at aurora.tech>
> >
> > efi_bind_block had two issues.
> > 1. A pointer to a the stack was inserted as plat structure and thus used
> > beyond its life time.
> > 2. Only the first segment of the device path was copied into the
> > platfom data structure resulting in an unterminated device path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Janis Danisevskis <jdanisevskis at aurora.tech>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett at aurora.tech>
> > ---
> >
> >   lib/efi/efi_app_init.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/efi/efi_app_init.c b/lib/efi/efi_app_init.c
> > index 9704020b749..cc91e1d74b8 100644
> > --- a/lib/efi/efi_app_init.c
> > +++ b/lib/efi/efi_app_init.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,15 @@
> >
> >   DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> >
> > +static size_t device_path_length(const struct efi_device_path *device_path)
> > +{
> > +     const struct efi_device_path *d;
> > +
> > +     for (d = device_path; d->type != DEVICE_PATH_TYPE_END; d = (void *)d + d->length) {
> > +     }
> > +     return (void *)d - (void *)device_path + d->length;
> > +}
> > +
> >   /**
> >    * efi_bind_block() - bind a new block device to an EFI device
> >    *
> > @@ -39,19 +48,23 @@ int efi_bind_block(efi_handle_t handle, struct efi_block_io *blkio,
> >                  struct efi_device_path *device_path, int len,
> >                  struct udevice **devp)
> >   {
> > -     struct efi_media_plat plat;
> > +     struct efi_media_plat *plat;
> >       struct udevice *dev;
> >       char name[18];
> >       int ret;
> > -
> > -     plat.handle = handle;
> > -     plat.blkio = blkio;
> > -     plat.device_path = malloc(device_path->length);
> > -     if (!plat.device_path)
> > +     size_t device_path_len = device_path_length(device_path);
> > +
> > +     plat = malloc(sizeof(struct efi_media_plat));
> > +     if (!plat)
> > +             return log_msg_ret("plat", -ENOMEM);
> > +     plat->handle = handle;
> > +     plat->blkio = blkio;
> > +     plat->device_path = malloc(device_path_len);
> > +     if (!plat->device_path)
> >               return log_msg_ret("path", -ENOMEM);
> > -     memcpy(plat.device_path, device_path, device_path->length);
> > +     memcpy(plat->device_path, device_path, device_path_len);
> >       ret = device_bind(dm_root(), DM_DRIVER_GET(efi_media), "efi_media",
> > -                       &plat, ofnode_null(), &dev);
> > +                       plat, ofnode_null(), &dev);
> >       if (ret)
> >               return log_msg_ret("bind", ret);
>
> Here you have a memory leak for pointer plat if ret != 0.
>
> Simon suggested a follow up patch. Instead we should fix it in this patch.
>
> @Simon
> The logic in the caller setup_block() looks wrong.
>
> LocateHandle() does not ensure that when you try to read from the block
> device the same still does exist. E.g. if a USB device is removed the
> block IO protocol could be uninstalled and the handle deleted and the
> EFI app may crash. Please, call OpenProtocol() with attribute BY_DRIVER.
>
> HandleProtocol() is considered deprecated. Please, use OpenProtocol()
> instead.

Can you please send a follow-up with your ideas on this?

Regards,
SImon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list