[PATCH 1/1] Added arm64 assembly for examples/api crt0

Brunham, Kalen kalen.brunham at intel.com
Tue Jun 4 05:34:55 CEST 2024


Hi Tom/Heinrich,

I have https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/pull/574 that has a proposed change. It is currently failing clang sandbox, which looks a little strange and I'm looking into it. Please let me know if you have any feedback on the general strategy.

Thanks,
-Kalen

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> 
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2024 1:23 PM
To: Brunham, Kalen <kalen.brunham at intel.com>
Cc: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang at flygoat.com>; Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de>; Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org>; U-Boot at lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Added arm64 assembly for examples/api crt0

On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 12:16:38AM +0000, Brunham, Kalen wrote:
> Thanks Tom.
> 
> Can you suggest who is the existing owner of this code I could work with?

You should CC Heinrich for sure once you have things working.

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> 
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2024 12:03 PM
> To: Brunham, Kalen <kalen.brunham at intel.com>
> Cc: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang at flygoat.com>; Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de>; Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org>; U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Added arm64 assembly for examples/api crt0
> 
> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 02:53:17PM +0000, Brunham, Kalen wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tom,
> > 
> > What are next steps on this change?
> > 
> > I'm committed to the idea of EFI apps opposed to examples/standalone.
> > EFI currently requires block devices which is not enabled when only using flash.
> > 
> > Should config BLK be updated to include DM_SPI_FLASH?
> > Should we explore how to remove BLK as a dependency for EFI_LOADER?
> 
> Yes, someone needs to explore how to cleanly make BLK optional for EFI_LOADER.
> 
> --
> Tom

-- 
Tom


More information about the U-Boot mailing list