[RFC PATCH 04/31] lmb: remove local instances of the lmb structure variable
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Wed Jun 12 00:08:56 CEST 2024
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 at 15:01, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 12:52:22PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 at 12:53, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > With the move of the LMB structure to a persistent state, there is no
> > > need to declare the variable locally, and pass it as part of the LMB
> > > API's. Remove all local variable instances and change the API's
> > > correspondingly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arc/lib/cache.c | 4 +-
> > > arch/arm/lib/stack.c | 4 +-
> > > arch/arm/mach-apple/board.c | 17 ++-
> > > arch/arm/mach-snapdragon/board.c | 17 ++-
> > > arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/dram_init.c | 7 +-
> > > arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/stm32mp1/cpu.c | 6 +-
> > > arch/m68k/lib/bootm.c | 7 +-
> > > arch/microblaze/lib/bootm.c | 4 +-
> > > arch/mips/lib/bootm.c | 9 +-
> > > arch/nios2/lib/bootm.c | 4 +-
> > > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c | 4 +-
> > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/mp.h | 4 +-
> > > arch/powerpc/lib/bootm.c | 14 +-
> > > arch/riscv/lib/bootm.c | 4 +-
> > > arch/sh/lib/bootm.c | 4 +-
> > > arch/x86/lib/bootm.c | 4 +-
> > > arch/xtensa/lib/bootm.c | 4 +-
> > > board/xilinx/common/board.c | 7 +-
> > > boot/bootm.c | 26 ++--
> > > boot/bootm_os.c | 5 +-
> > > boot/image-board.c | 32 ++---
> > > boot/image-fdt.c | 29 ++---
> > > cmd/bdinfo.c | 6 +-
> > > cmd/booti.c | 2 +-
> > > cmd/bootz.c | 2 +-
> > > cmd/load.c | 7 +-
> > > drivers/iommu/apple_dart.c | 7 +-
> > > drivers/iommu/sandbox_iommu.c | 15 +--
> > > fs/fs.c | 7 +-
> > > include/image.h | 22 +---
> > > include/lmb.h | 39 +++---
> > > lib/lmb.c | 81 ++++++------
> > > net/tftp.c | 5 +-
> > > net/wget.c | 5 +-
> > > test/cmd/bdinfo.c | 2 +-
> > > test/lib/lmb.c | 187 +++++++++++++--------------
> > > 36 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 333 deletions(-)
> >
> > This isn't necessary...and it will make things harder. You can have a
> > global 'lmb' while still allowing passing a different pointer when
> > needed.
>
> There's only one reservation checking system and list of known
> reservations, keep in mind.
There is only one driver model, too, but we use a pointer. It makes
tests much easier.
In fact I see elsewhere in this series that it causes problems with
tests. Best to use a pointer so it is easy to update.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list