[PATCH 1/4] power: regulator: Trigger probe of regulators which are always-on or boot-on
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Thu Jun 27 11:26:20 CEST 2024
Hi Svyatoslav,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 10:09, Svyatoslav <clamor95 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> 27 червня 2024 р. 11:48:46 GMT+03:00, Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly at linaro.org> написав(-ла):
> >
> >
> >On 27/06/2024 10:37, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Marek,
> >>
> >> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 00:57, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> In case a regulator DT node contains regulator-always-on or regulator-boot-on
> >>> property, make sure the regulator gets correctly configured by U-Boot on start
> >>> up. Unconditionally probe such regulator drivers. This is a preparatory patch
> >>> for introduction of .regulator_post_probe() which would trigger the regulator
> >>> configuration.
> >>>
> >>> Parsing of regulator-always-on and regulator-boot-on DT property has been
> >>> moved to regulator_post_bind() as the information is required early, the
> >>> rest of the DT parsing has been kept in regulator_pre_probe() to avoid
> >>> slowing down the boot process.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> >>> ---
> >>> Cc: Ben Wolsieffer <benwolsieffer at gmail.com>
> >>> Cc: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly at linaro.org>
> >>> Cc: Chris Morgan <macromorgan at hotmail.com>
> >>> Cc: Dragan Simic <dsimic at manjaro.org>
> >>> Cc: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev at collabora.com>
> >>> Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini at toradex.com>
> >>> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de>
> >>> Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com>
> >>> Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
> >>> Cc: Jonas Karlman <jonas at kwiboo.se>
> >>> Cc: Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com>
> >>> Cc: Kostya Porotchkin <kostap at marvell.com>
> >>> Cc: Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi at engicam.com>
> >>> Cc: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek at baylibre.com>
> >>> Cc: Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher at toradex.com>
> >>> Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org>
> >>> Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard at foss.st.com>
> >>> Cc: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay at foss.st.com>
> >>> Cc: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich at vrull.eu>
> >>> Cc: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at cherry.de>
> >>> Cc: Sam Day <me at samcday.com>
> >>> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >>> Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg at linaro.org>
> >>> Cc: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95 at gmail.com>
> >>> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> >>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> >>> Cc: Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk at epam.com>
> >>> Cc: u-boot-amlogic at groups.io
> >>> Cc: u-boot-qcom at groups.io
> >>> Cc: u-boot at dh-electronics.com
> >>> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> >>> Cc: uboot-stm32 at st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> >>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c b/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c
> >>> index 66fd531da04..ccc4ef33d83 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c
> >>> @@ -433,6 +433,8 @@ static int regulator_post_bind(struct udevice *dev)
> >>> const char *property = "regulator-name";
> >>>
> >>> uc_pdata = dev_get_uclass_plat(dev);
> >>> + uc_pdata->always_on = dev_read_bool(dev, "regulator-always-on");
> >>> + uc_pdata->boot_on = dev_read_bool(dev, "regulator-boot-on");
> >>>
> >>> /* Regulator's mandatory constraint */
> >>> uc_pdata->name = dev_read_string(dev, property);
> >>> @@ -444,13 +446,21 @@ static int regulator_post_bind(struct udevice *dev)
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - if (regulator_name_is_unique(dev, uc_pdata->name))
> >>> - return 0;
> >>> + if (!regulator_name_is_unique(dev, uc_pdata->name)) {
> >>> + debug("'%s' of dev: '%s', has nonunique value: '%s\n",
> >>> + property, dev->name, uc_pdata->name);
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>>
> >>> - debug("'%s' of dev: '%s', has nonunique value: '%s\n",
> >>> - property, dev->name, uc_pdata->name);
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * In case the regulator has regulator-always-on or
> >>> + * regulator-boot-on DT property, trigger probe() to
> >>> + * configure its default state during startup.
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (uc_pdata->always_on && uc_pdata->boot_on)
> >>> + dev_or_flags(dev, DM_FLAG_PROBE_AFTER_BIND);
> >>>
> >>> - return -EINVAL;
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static int regulator_pre_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> >>> @@ -473,8 +483,6 @@ static int regulator_pre_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> >>> -ENODATA);
> >>> uc_pdata->max_uA = dev_read_u32_default(dev, "regulator-max-microamp",
> >>> -ENODATA);
> >>> - uc_pdata->always_on = dev_read_bool(dev, "regulator-always-on");
> >>> - uc_pdata->boot_on = dev_read_bool(dev, "regulator-boot-on");
> >>> uc_pdata->ramp_delay = dev_read_u32_default(dev, "regulator-ramp-delay",
> >>> 0);
> >>> uc_pdata->force_off = dev_read_bool(dev, "regulator-force-boot-off");
> >>> --
> >>> 2.43.0
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is reading a lot of DT stuff very early, which may be slow. It is
> >> also reading from the DT in the bind() step which we sometimes have to
> >> do, but try to avoid.
> >
> >Could we set up the livetree pre-bind? What about MMU? On armv8 at least this would have a huge impact on performance. I've done some measurements and there is at least 1 order of magnitude difference between parsing FDT with no caches vs parsing livetree with, it's huge.
> >>
> >> Also this seems to happen in SPL and again pre-reloc and again in
> >> U-Boot post-reloc?
>
> Not so long ago I proposed a similar patchset with the same goal
> and I have discovered massive issues with SPL and relocation
> interfering with driver loading.
>
> The issue which I have personally encountered was i2c driver failure
> due to double probing. This behavior was triggered by
> always-on/boot-on regulators provided by pmic which in most
> cases is an i2c device.
>
> At that time everyone just ignored me, so idk if tegra i2c is the only
> driver which has this response or there are more, but be aware that
> this patch set may cause cascade failure on many devices.
I'm not sure if I remember this, but I can certainly see some problems
with it. Did we have drivers that probed in the bind() function,
perhaps?
>
> Best regards,
> Svyatoslav R.
>
> >>
> >> Should we have a step in the init sequence where we set up the
> >> regulators, by calling regulators_enable_boot_on() ?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Simon
> >
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list