[PATCH] zlib: Fix big performance regression
Christophe Leroy
christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu
Sun Jun 30 20:49:08 CEST 2024
Le 30/06/2024 à 20:28, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>
>
> Le 30/06/2024 à 16:54, Tom Rini a écrit :
>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 10:47:06AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 27/06/2024 à 21:40, Tom Rini a écrit :
>>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 01:34:55PM -0600, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 10:25:21AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Commit 340fdf1303dc ("zlib: Port fix for CVE-2016-9841 to U-Boot")
>>>>>> brings a big performance regression in inflate_fast(), which leads
>>>>>> to watchdog timer reset on powerpc 8xx.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks like that commit does more than what it describe, it
>>>>>> especially removed an important optimisation that was doing copies
>>>>>> using halfwords instead of bytes. That unexpected change multiplied
>>>>>> by almost 4 the time spent in inflate_fast() and increased by 40%
>>>>>> the overall time needed to uncompress linux kernel image.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So partially revert that commit but keep post incrementation as it
>>>>>> is the initial purpose of said commit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 340fdf1303dc ("zlib: Port fix for CVE-2016-9841 to U-Boot")
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> lib/zlib/inffast.c | 51
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Both this, and my mostly revert lead to CI failures around compression
>>>>> tests:
>>>>> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/jobs/859329
>>>>
>>>> A full revert however, is fine.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is it that ? :
>>>
>>> FAILED
>>> test/py/tests/test_ut.py::test_ut[ut_compression_compression_test_gzip]
>>>
>>> It seems like when the optimisation was added by commit cd514aeb996e
>>> ("zlib:
>>> Optimize decompression"), only the pre-increment implementation was
>>> available.
>>>
>>> When POSTINC was added by commit e89516f031db ("zlib: split up to match
>>> original source tree"), I guess it was not verified because POSTINC is
>>> #undef by zlib.h.
>>>
>>> With the following change I don't get the FAILED
>>> ut_compression_compression_test_gzip CI anymore
>>> (https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-mpc8xx/-/jobs/859937)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/zlib/inffast.c b/lib/zlib/inffast.c
>>> index c271d85ea1..5dc0574202 100644
>>> --- a/lib/zlib/inffast.c
>>> +++ b/lib/zlib/inffast.c
>>> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ void inflate_fast(z_streamp strm, unsigned start)
>>> sfrom = (unsigned short *)(from - OFF);
>>> loops = len >> 1;
>>> do
>>> - PUP(sout) = get_unaligned(++sfrom);
>>> + PUP(sout) = get_unaligned(sfrom++);
>>> while (--loops);
>>> out = (unsigned char *)sout + OFF;
>>> from = (unsigned char *)sfrom + OFF;
>>
>> Ah, thanks! Testing again now.
>>
>
> That's probably not enough. I thought other failures were unrelated but
> I gave it a try with a full revert and I get no failure at all with that
> so there must be other things.
>
> I find that pat16 = *(sout-2+2*OFF) suspicious, sout being a short it
> means -4 bytes which is not what is expected I think.
That's it. I get all green with the following, see
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-mpc8xx/-/pipelines/21391
diff --git a/lib/zlib/inffast.c b/lib/zlib/inffast.c
index c271d85ea1..69268caee8 100644
--- a/lib/zlib/inffast.c
+++ b/lib/zlib/inffast.c
@@ -257,14 +257,14 @@ void inflate_fast(z_streamp strm, unsigned start)
sfrom = (unsigned short *)(from - OFF);
loops = len >> 1;
do
- PUP(sout) = get_unaligned(++sfrom);
+ PUP(sout) = get_unaligned(sfrom++);
while (--loops);
out = (unsigned char *)sout + OFF;
from = (unsigned char *)sfrom + OFF;
} else { /* dist == 1 or dist == 2 */
unsigned short pat16;
- pat16 = *(sout-2+2*OFF);
+ pat16 = *(sout-1+OFF);
if (dist == 1)
#if defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
pat16 = (pat16 & 0xff) | ((pat16 & 0xff ) << 8);
Christophe
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list