[PATCH] mach-snapdragon: do carveouts for qcs404 only

[Sumit Garg]

On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 18:09, Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> On 08/05/2024 13:40, Sam Day wrote:
> > Salutations Sumit,
> >
> > On Wednesday, 8 May 2024 at 11:14 AM, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg at linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Sam,
> >>
> >> On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 00:11, Sam Day me at samcday.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> The newly introduced carve_out_reserved_memory causes issues when
> >>> U-Boot is chained from the lk2nd bootloader. lk2nd provides a
> >>> simple-framebuffer device and marks the framebuffer region as no-map in
> >>> the supplied /reserved-memory. Consequently, the simple_video driver
> >>> triggers a page fault when it tries to write to this region.
> >>
> >>
> >> How does the corresponding Linux kernel driver handle this?
> >
> > Firstly: I'm something of a middle-man here. I would consider Caleb the authoritative source on the carveouts stuff (since they wrote it) and Nikita Travkin the authority on the simplefb handoff (since he originally wrote it for lk2nd to hand off to Linux simpledrm and then adapted it to work with U-Boot simplefb).
> >
> > I consulted with Nikita on your first question here. He linked me to this snippet: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.9-rc7/source/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c#L877
> >
> >>   Is the
> >> framebuffer region required to be mapped as normal memory or device
> >> type or something else?
> >
> > So I guess based on the link above, it's just mapped as normal uncached memory.
> >
> > I tried to do something like this a few days ago in U-Boot, but a) it doesn't work and b) I have no idea what I'm doing: https://github.com/samcday/u-boot/commit/c100cb3711ddf5b01601691f3e6a9ec890d9a496

Can you start adding some debug prints as to what might be happening?
Also, look at my proposal below to hook memory mapping properly for
drivers.

> >
> > After talking with Caleb about this for a bit, they suggested the patch you see here as what I guess could be considered a "stopgap" solution that hopefully makes it into 2024.07.
> >
> >> Similarly would normal memory type work for
> >> all other reserved memory regions marked as no-map?
> >
> > I'll let Caleb weigh in here. My understanding is that the other regions *should* be marked as PTE_TYPE_FAULT because otherwise drivers might inadvertently speculatively access regions that are very much off-limits, such as TZ app regions.
>
> Right, carving out reserved regions and having the driver handle them is
> theoretically the "correct" thing to do here. But I'm not sure that the
> additional complexity offers much value from a U-Boot context.
>
> If we can teach the armv8 PT/cache code to handle this better, and teach
> all the drivers to map their regions on-demand, this would probably help
> us a lot (especially as right now if you attempt to access dead space
> between peripherals then you'll hang the bus...). But U-Boot is a ways
> away from that.

I am not sure if U-Boot is really that far away although you can say
the infrastructure is not hooked up for Arm. Have a look into
map_physmem() and unmap_physmem() utilized by various drivers which
are actually hooked up on MIPS. So I think the right way to approach
this feature on Qcom platforms is to start hooking up those APIs on
mach-snapdragon to begin with via mmu_set_region_dcache_behaviour()
underneath. We can always go ahead and make it more generic if needed
on other platforms too.

-Sumit