[PATCH 1/1] Squashed 'dts/upstream/' changes from b35b9bd1d4ee..7e08733c96c8

Sumit Garg sumit.garg at linaro.org
Thu May 16 08:09:05 CEST 2024


On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 21:30, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:39:08AM +0200, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > My main concern is how to best handle new boards and features/drivers.
> > E.g. for Rockchip the RK3588 SoC is under active development, new boards
> > and features/drivers are actively added/fixed in upstream Linux.
>
> To this question specifically, dts/update-dts-subtree.sh has a "pick"
> option and in some previous quick testing, it does what one would hope.
> So for this case you could pick the N commits that need to be brought
> it, the resulting patch would be small enough to send to the list
> normally (the resync patch for v6.9 is 2.7MB) and then when I do the
> next full resync it goes cleanly still.

That sounds like a good alternative although it was proposed for any
fixes to be incorporated but it's worth giving it a try for new
features too. I think as long as the cherry pick is clean with all
dependencies being picked up properly, the next sync should work
cleanly.

-Sumit

>
> --
> Tom


More information about the U-Boot mailing list