回复: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 14/17] imx95_evk: add i.MX95 19x19 EVK board basic support

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 09:43:14AM +0000, Alice Guo (OSS) wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
> 
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com>
> > 发送时间: 2024年10月16日 19:36
> > 收件人: Alice Guo (OSS) <alice.guo at oss.nxp.com>
> > 抄送: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>; Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx.de>;
> > Sean Anderson <seanga2 at gmail.com>; Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>;
> > Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>; dl-uboot-imx <uboot-imx at nxp.com>;
> > u-boot at lists.denx.de; Ye Li <ye.li at nxp.com>; Alice Guo <alice.guo at nxp.com>;
> > Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> > 主题: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 14/17] imx95_evk: add i.MX95 19x19 EVK board basic
> > support
> > 
> > Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> > opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this
> > email' button
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Alice,
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 4:19 AM Alice Guo <alice.guo at oss.nxp.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Ye Li <ye.li at nxp.com>
> > >
> > > This patch adds i.MX95 19x19 EVK board basic support.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ye Li <ye.li at nxp.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Alice Guo <alice.guo at nxp.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> > 
> > A MAINTAINERS file is missing. CI flags this as an error.
> > 
> > Please make sure to run the series through CI before posting v2.
> > 
> > A general question: how is the flash.bin generated?
> > 
> > I don't see binman support here. Why?
> > 
> > We also need a doc/board/nxp/imx95_evk.rts file that explains how to build and
> > boot the board, the firmware files it needs, etc.
> > 
> 
> We will have new revision silicon that not compatible with current silicon container format. The current version will not goes into mass production, so I prefer to defer the binman work when new revision silicon arrives. With current patchset, I could add doc to use imx-mkimage to pack images. With new revision silicons ready, we could switch to binman and update doc then. Is this ok for your?

I would expect the binman support to be easily adjusted to the new
format when it's available for you to test and we can easily enough mark
the first format as deprecated to start with so removing it later is
also known up-front.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20241101/9d2ee64c/attachment.sig>