[PATCH 03/21] bloblist: test: doc: Move into the common suite

[Simon Glass]

Hi Tom,

On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 19:10, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 07:00:41PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 at 17:36, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 04:45:40PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 at 20:33, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 01:41:08PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > There is no particular need for bloblist to have its own test suite.
> > > > > > Move it into the common suite instead.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Add the missing help for 'common' and update the docs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > This feels both like churn and weird. I would think "common" tests are
> > > > > for things that are kinda legacy and too catch-all to have their own
> > > > > subgroup.
> > > >
> > > > It's just chosen so that the test for common/ is in test/common - i.e.
> > > > it makes it easier for people to find it.
> > >
> > > Then I really don't understand renaming bloblist from something
> > > descriptive to common which is not.
> >
> > Old: test/bloblist.c
> > New: test/common/bloblist.c
> >
> > It is only the directory that is changing.
>
> Then some of the commit messages need to be reworked? It looks like it
> stops being "ut bloblist" and part of "ut common" and that's my concern.

Oh I see...

I basically decided that there is no point in having a special suite
for bloblist, and some other things. A better way to handle this would
be to allow running tests which match a name, e.g. 'ut common
bloblist', because we are adding way too many suites IMO.

Regards,
Simon