[Binman] Question regarding SPL symbol offsets generation
Adam Ford
aford173 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 4 02:41:24 CET 2024
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 8:54 AM Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 3:04 AM Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Simon,
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 12:47, Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Lukasz,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 5:14 PM Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx.de>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Unfortunately not - this change is only for properly setting
> > > > > > start address of the u-boot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The _real_ problem here is the symbol placement generated by
> > > > > > binman when we try to define the image as a single one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Moreover, this change follows other boards with imx8mm
> > > > > > processor - ./configs/imx8mm_beacon_fspi_defconfig to be
> > > > > > specific.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The "fix" (for which I'd been now probably opt) for this issue
> > > > > > would be to generate two images with binman - one for
> > > > > > u-boot-spl-ddr.bin and the final flash.bin with the former one
> > > > > > included (as it was before SHA1:
> > > > > > 37e50627efacd8dae18b564e9d8886a033e181bc)
> > > > >
> > > > > Is QSPI boot broken on i.MX8MM?
> > > > >
> > > > > I am adding Adam and Mamta who have tested QSPI booting on
> > > > > imx8mm_beacon and imx8mm_evk, respectively.
> > > >
> > > > Note also that I sent a series[1] which allows the symbols-base
> > > > to be adjusted, if that helps.
> > >
> > > I've seen them - but not yet tested.
> > >
> > > Thanks Simon for the patch series.
> >
> > Is it still broken with this patch series? I have been traveling and
> > haven't had much time to test.
>
> Yes, I can confirm that it is still broken.
Sorry for the delay. I had to return my 8MM to Beacon, and I was
waiting for a replacement.
To not prolong it anymore, I decided to try it with an 8M Nano, and I
got a boot failure on master. I was able to successfully boot
2024.01-rc5, but I haven't had time to bisect it yet. I'll try to do
that this week. I think once we can bisect the error, it might become
more apparent.
adam
>
> I've applied:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20240826191143.426387-1-sjg@chromium.org/
>
> on top of mainline:
> SHA1: 1630ff26cc960439b5949b80cfc604a2c8aa47dd
>
> Adding symbols-base = <0>; to imx8mm-u-boot.dtsi did not help.
>
> >
> > adam
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Simon
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=421010
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Lukasz Majewski
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
> > > HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell,
> > > Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email:
> > > lukma at denx.de
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lukasz Majewski
>
> --
>
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma at denx.de
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list