[PATCH 1/4] clk: imx: clk-imx8mn Fix nand and spi clock parent

Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi michael at amarulasolutions.com
Mon Nov 4 17:28:47 CET 2024


Hi Adam

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 5:11 PM Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 3:45 AM Michael Trimarchi
> <michael at amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> > The osc_24m is the clock-output-name and not the one that
> > is used as internal name reference from the strcmp. The clock
> > that use osc_24m, will not be able to reparent it as they should.
> > We need anyway register the osc_24m clock fixed factor in the clock
> > tree.
> >
> > Fixes: 710c4ffb890 ("clk: imx: clk-imx8mn add gpmi nand clocks")
> > Fixes: 85b1c11989c ("clk: imx: Add ECSPI to iMX8MN")
> > Cc: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael at amarulasolutions.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mn.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mn.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mn.c
> > index ed9e16d7c1..bfd1677520 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mn.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mn.c
> > @@ -57,15 +57,15 @@ static const char *imx8mn_usdhc2_sels[] = {"clock-osc-24m", "sys_pll1_400m", "sy
> >                                            "sys_pll3_out", "sys_pll1_266m", "audio_pll2_out", "sys_pll1_100m", };
> >
> >  #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_SPI)
> > -static const char *imx8mn_ecspi1_sels[] = {"osc_24m", "sys_pll2_200m", "sys_pll1_40m",
> > +static const char *imx8mn_ecspi1_sels[] = {"clock-osc-24m", "sys_pll2_200m", "sys_pll1_40m",
> >                                            "sys_pll1_160m", "sys_pll1_800m", "sys_pll3_out",
> >                                            "sys_pll2_250m", "audio_pll2_out", };
> >
> > -static const char *imx8mn_ecspi2_sels[] = {"osc_24m", "sys_pll2_200m", "sys_pll1_40m",
> > +static const char *imx8mn_ecspi2_sels[] = {"clock-osc-24m", "sys_pll2_200m", "sys_pll1_40m",
> >                                            "sys_pll1_160m", "sys_pll1_800m", "sys_pll3_out",
> >                                            "sys_pll2_250m", "audio_pll2_out", };
> >
> > -static const char *imx8mn_ecspi3_sels[] = {"osc_24m", "sys_pll2_200m", "sys_pll1_40m",
> > +static const char *imx8mn_ecspi3_sels[] = {"clock-osc-24m", "sys_pll2_200m", "sys_pll1_40m",
> >                                            "sys_pll1_160m", "sys_pll1_800m", "sys_pll3_out",
> >                                            "sys_pll2_250m", "audio_pll2_out", };
> >  #endif
> > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static const char *imx8mn_usdhc3_sels[] = {"clock-osc-24m", "sys_pll1_400m", "sy
> >  static const char *imx8mn_qspi_sels[] = {"clock-osc-24m", "sys_pll1_400m", "sys_pll2_333m", "sys_pll2_500m",
> >                                            "audio_pll2_out", "sys_pll1_266m", "sys_pll3_out", "sys_pll1_100m", };
> >
> > -static const char * const imx8mn_nand_sels[] = {"osc_24m", "sys_pll2_500m", "audio_pll1_out",
> > +static const char * const imx8mn_nand_sels[] = {"clock-osc-24m", "sys_pll2_500m", "audio_pll1_out",
> >                                                 "sys_pll1_400m", "audio_pll2_out", "sys_pll3_out",
> >                                                 "sys_pll2_250m", "video_pll_out", };
> >
> > @@ -119,7 +119,9 @@ static const char * const imx8mn_usb_phy_sels[] = {"clock-osc-24m", "sys_pll1_10
> >
> >  static int imx8mn_clk_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> >  {
> > +       struct clk osc_24m_clk;
> >         void __iomem *base;
> > +       int ret;
> >
> >         base = (void *)ANATOP_BASE_ADDR;
> >
> > @@ -238,6 +240,11 @@ static int imx8mn_clk_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> >         clk_dm(IMX8MN_SYS_PLL2_1000M,
> >                imx_clk_fixed_factor("sys_pll2_1000m", "sys_pll2_out", 1, 1));
> >
>
> I know it's late, but I didn't get around to testing my Nano board for
> a while.  Sorry for the delayed feedback...
>
> > +       ret = clk_get_by_name(dev, "osc_24m", &osc_24m_clk);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               return ret;
> > +       clk_dm(IMX8MN_CLK_24M, dev_get_clk_ptr(osc_24m_clk.dev));
> > +
>
> These four lines appear to have introduced a regression on the
> imx8mn-beacon board.  In the SPL phase, I get an error message
> indicating it cannot find the i2c clk, then access to the PMIC fails.
> If I remove these four lines, the error message disappears, and the
> PMIC is happy again.
>
> I have confirmed that CLK, and SPL_CLK are both defined.   I checked
> the u-boot-spl.dtb and it shows clock-osc-24m with clock-output-names
> = "osc_24m"
>
> I have also tried to mark the 24m clock as with bootph-pre-ram;:
> &{/clock-osc-24m} {
>   bootph-pre-ram;
> };
>
> Unfortunately, nothing is helping, and I am not sure what else to try.
> clk_fixed_rate.o is built into my SPL, so I don't think it's a config
> issue.  I need to the PMIC to increase the voltage since we run the
> Nano in overdrive mode to run the LPDDR4 at the highest speed.
>
> Might anyone have any suggestions?
>

Not yet. I have a similar setup but I don't set pmic, so I think that
the symbol is not find
in SPL and it just fail clock registration. Is that possible?

If (ret)

put here a print

Michael
> adam
>
> >         base = dev_read_addr_ptr(dev);
> >         if (!base)
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >



-- 
Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer
M. +39 347 913 2170
michael at amarulasolutions.com
__________________________________

Amarula Solutions BV
Joop Geesinkweg 125, 1114 AB, Amsterdam, NL
T. +31 (0)85 111 9172
info at amarulasolutions.com
www.amarulasolutions.com


More information about the U-Boot mailing list