[PATCH v5 03/11] led: implement LED boot API
Christian Marangi
ansuelsmth at gmail.com
Tue Nov 5 00:13:51 CET 2024
On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:46:19AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 13:52, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 01:50:13PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Christian,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 13:36, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 01:33:10PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > > Hi Christian,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 16:55, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 06:25, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Implement LED boot API to signal correct boot of the system.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > led_boot_on/off/blink() are introduced to turn ON, OFF and BLINK the
> > > > > > > designated boot LED.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > New Kconfig is introduced, CONFIG_LED_BOOT to enable the feature.
> > > > > > > This makes use of the /options/u-boot property "boot-led" to the
> > > > > > > define the boot LED.
> > > > > > > It's also introduced a new /options/u-boot property "boot-led-period"
> > > > > > > to define the default period when the LED is set to blink mode.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > BTW could you please send a schema update for this so that Linux accepts it?
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm just checking that you did this?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yep [0]. Also tagged Rob 2 hours ago. (eh the coincidence)
> > > >
> > > > Tell me if I should send it with usual way with a dedicated mail. (any
> > > > hint on the mailing-list address?)
> > >
> > > OK great! Yes, once it lands, please send a patch to bring it into U-Boot
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Simon
> > >
> > > > [0] https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/144
> >
> > I'm confused what kind of patch I should send to U-Boot?
>
> Something to add the binding to U-Boot also. See my patch at [1]
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20241103003322.626036-26-sjg@chromium.org/
Ok thanks for the hint.
Anyway Rob checked the patch (good news) but he request some changes
(bad news)
I created this PR [1] waiting for CI to confirm everything is ok.
Would be good if you can check the changes while CI tests.
[1] https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/pull/686
--
Ansuel
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list