[PATCH v2 4/6] net: eth_bootdev_hunt() should not run DHCP
Heinrich Schuchardt
heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com
Wed Nov 27 15:00:35 CET 2024
On 27.11.24 14:07, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 at 00:07, Heinrich Schuchardt
> <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> Currently when booting dhcp_run() may be executed multiple times:
>> once in eth_bootdev_hunt() and once in the network booting bootmeth.
>>
>> We need to call eth_bootdev_hunt() when setting up the EFI sub-system to
>> supply the simple network protocol. We don't need an IP address set up.
>>
>> We can reduce the bootime by not executing dhcp_run() in
>> eth_bootdev_hunt().
>>
>> Furthermore eth_bootdev_hunt() with autostart=yes leads on the legacy
>> network statck leads to downloading a file via TFTP and to booting the
>
> spelling
>
>> downloaded file.
>
> I have now found the feature you're referring to - the calls to
> env_get_autostart(). Perhaps we can remove this feature? It seems
> pretty old and I don't see boards using it.
>
> That feature stops bootstd working properly.
>
> But if we don't remove it, we need to disable autostart in dhcp_run(),
> since in that case it does not behave correctly. I can do a patch for
> that if needed.
>
>>
>> Instead of running dchp_run() just check that there is a network device
>> in eth_bootdev_hunt().
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> reword the commit message
>> ---
>> net/eth_bootdev.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/eth_bootdev.c b/net/eth_bootdev.c
>> index 6ee54e3c790..b0fca6e8313 100644
>> --- a/net/eth_bootdev.c
>> +++ b/net/eth_bootdev.c
>> @@ -64,9 +64,23 @@ static int eth_bootdev_bind(struct udevice *dev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * eth_bootdev_hunt() - probe all network devices
>> + *
>> + * Network devices can also come from USB, but that is a higher
>> + * priority (BOOTDEVP_5_SCAN_SLOW) than network, so it should have been
>> + * enumerated already. If something like 'bootflow scan dhcp' is used,
>> + * then the user will need to run 'usb start' first.
>> + *
>> + * @info: info structure describing this hunter
>> + * @show: true to show information from the hunter
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 if device found, -EINVAL otherwise
>> + */
>> static int eth_bootdev_hunt(struct bootdev_hunter *info, bool show)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> + struct udevice *dev = NULL;
>>
>> if (!test_eth_enabled())
>> return 0;
>> @@ -78,19 +92,11 @@ static int eth_bootdev_hunt(struct bootdev_hunter *info, bool show)
>> log_warning("Failed to init PCI (%dE)\n", ret);
>> }
>>
>> - /*
>> - * Ethernet devices can also come from USB, but that is a higher
>> - * priority (BOOTDEVP_5_SCAN_SLOW) than ethernet, so it should have been
>> - * enumerated already. If something like 'bootflow scan dhcp' is used
>> - * then the user will need to run 'usb start' first.
>> - */
>
> Please keep this comment
I have moved the comment to the function description. See above. I think
that is the adequate place.
>
>> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMD_DHCP)) {
>> - ret = dhcp_run(0, NULL, false);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + uclass_foreach_dev_probe(UCLASS_ETH, dev)
>> + ret = 0;
>
> There is a uclass_probe_all() function.
>
> My suggestion from the original series was to just do the dhcp once.
>
> How does probing the ethernet devices actually help EFI? It is not
> needed for bootstd, since it probes any devices it uses.
bootstd is not the only way to start an EFI application, you could use
bootefi or bootm.
Best regards
Heinrich
>
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> struct bootdev_ops eth_bootdev_ops = {
>> --
>> 2.45.2
>>
>
> Regards,
> Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list