[BUG regression in HEAD] efi: memory: use the lmb API's for allocating and freeing memory
E Shattow
lucent at gmail.com
Wed Nov 27 15:11:15 CET 2024
Replying my own message postscript
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 4:47 AM E Shattow <lucent at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Following up on this with some positive results:
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 4:22 AM Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > On 21.11.24 09:04, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 at 13:49, E Shattow <lucent at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi all, (on-list)
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 9:14 PM Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 at 10:09, E Shattow <lucent at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 6:42 PM Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 at 04:48, E Shattow <lucent at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hello,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On HEAD some commits after v2024.10 I encounter a regression for
> > >>>>>> `bootefi bootmgr` fail with error "Not a PE-COFF file"; The fall-thru
> > >>>>>> case of global EFI boot is successful.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Having run a git bisect I discover the first bad commit 22f2c9ed:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> $ git checkout -b master origin/master
> > >>>>>> branch 'master' set up to track 'origin/master'.
> > >>>>>> Switched to a new branch 'master'
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect start
> > >>>>>> status: waiting for both good and bad commits
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect bad HEAD
> > >>>>>> status: waiting for good commit(s), bad commit known
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect good v2024.10
> > >>>>>> Bisecting: 850 revisions left to test after this (roughly 10 steps)
> > >>>>>> [82686e678e1587ddbd9570f82c58cdc3aecf2dbe] Merge branch 'staging' of
> > >>>>>> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-tegra
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect good
> > >>>>>> Bisecting: 422 revisions left to test after this (roughly 9 steps)
> > >>>>>> [8963d433eb5d4a9f3a9def84e9c61a45c13e72bc] Merge tag
> > >>>>>> 'u-boot-rockchip-20241026' of
> > >>>>>> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-rockchip
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect bad
> > >>>>>> Bisecting: 214 revisions left to test after this (roughly 8 steps)
> > >>>>>> [0a504585d1cefeaf35ae8f860a5e5aa44dfffed5] arm: dts: k3-j722s-binman:
> > >>>>>> Add support for HS-SE
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect bad
> > >>>>>> Bisecting: 106 revisions left to test after this (roughly 7 steps)
> > >>>>>> [88057dab2cde8710ccc95d12fb312184e0b023ca] mtd: spi-nor: Allow flashes
> > >>>>>> to specify MTD writesize
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect good
> > >>>>>> Bisecting: 53 revisions left to test after this (roughly 6 steps)
> > >>>>>> [625d40ab120dbc6f45dbd975857f8f87e422bd0f] test: boot: fix
> > >>>>>> bootflow_cmd_label for when DSA_SANDBOX is disabled
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect bad
> > >>>>>> Bisecting: 26 revisions left to test after this (roughly 5 steps)
> > >>>>>> [5b9261fb0b1ed087387f2036d279fd3f4bb20a61] Makefile: Drop
> > >>>>>> SPL_FIT_GENERATOR support
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect good
> > >>>>>> Bisecting: 13 revisions left to test after this (roughly 4 steps)
> > >>>>>> [e1b6822d6522d94d579d53092342b542d368a04b] efi_memory: do not add RAM
> > >>>>>> memory to the memory map
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect bad
> > >>>>>> Bisecting: 6 revisions left to test after this (roughly 3 steps)
> > >>>>>> [2f6191526a1325b6ddb59795a093eca69dbf8976] lmb: notify of any changes
> > >>>>>> to the LMB memory map
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect bad
> > >>>>>> Bisecting: 2 revisions left to test after this (roughly 2 steps)
> > >>>>>> [3c6896ad2fb876b0a23202f62a83c0d44380c9ea] lmb: add a flag to allow
> > >>>>>> suppressing memory map change notification
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect good
> > >>>>>> Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 1 step)
> > >>>>>> [22f2c9ed9f533a56bed09bd4e0e37852b6b9f3b1] efi: memory: use the lmb
> > >>>>>> API's for allocating and freeing memory
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect bad
> > >>>>>> Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps)
> > >>>>>> [eb052cbb896fee6f947765b44b0d80a54b19ce1a] lmb: add and reserve memory
> > >>>>>> above ram_top
> > >>>>>> $ git bisect good
> > >>>>>> 22f2c9ed9f533a56bed09bd4e0e37852b6b9f3b1 is the first bad commit
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> A commit is good if Star64 boots and absent the error about "Not a
> > >>>>>> PE-COFF file" (duly confirmed by eficonfig to adjust boot order
> > >>>>>> allowing removable media of an OS installer image on SD Card to be the
> > >>>>>> priority, verifying that the installer runs as expected). A commit is
> > >>>>>> bad if U-Boot crashes and/or has the error "Not a PE-COFF file".
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Can you post the output of the following. Thanks.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 1) running the 'bdinfo' command
> > >>>>
> > >>>> U-Boot SPL 2024.10-00989-geb052cbb896f (Nov 19 2024 - 14:39:43 -0800)
> > >>>> ...
> > >>>> StarFive # bdinfo
> > >>>> boot_params = 0x0000000000000000
> > >>>> DRAM bank = 0x0000000000000000
> > >>>> -> start = 0x0000000040000000
> > >>>> -> size = 0x0000000100000000
> > >>>> flashstart = 0x0000000000000000
> > >>>> flashsize = 0x0000000000000000
> > >>>> flashoffset = 0x0000000000000000
> > >>>> baudrate = 115200 bps
> > >>>> relocaddr = 0x00000000fff46000
> > >>>> reloc off = 0x00000000bfd46000
> > >>>> Build = 64-bit
> > >>>> current eth = ethernet at 16030000
> > >>>> ethaddr = 6c:cf:39:00:75:63
> > >>>> IP addr = <NULL>
> > >>>> fdt_blob = 0x00000000ff72da20
> > >>>> lmb_dump_all:
> > >>>> memory.count = 0x1
> > >>>> memory[0] [0x40000000-0x13fffffff], 0x100000000 bytes flags: none
> > >>>> reserved.count = 0x2
> > >>>> reserved[0] [0x40000000-0x4005ffff], 0x00060000 bytes flags: no-map
> > >>>> reserved[1] [0xfe729630-0xffffffff], 0x018d69d0 bytes flags: no-overwrite
> > >>>> devicetree = board
> > >>>> serial addr = 0x0000000010000000
> > >>>> width = 0x0000000000000004
> > >>>> shift = 0x0000000000000002
> > >>>> offset = 0x0000000000000000
> > >>>> clock = 0x00000000016e3600
> > >>>> boot hart = 0x0000000000000001
> > >>>> firmware fdt= 0x0000000042200000
> > >>>>
> > >>>> U-Boot SPL 2025.01-rc2-00129-g7fe55182d926 (Nov 19 2024 - 19:56:55 -0800)
> > >>>> ...
> > >>>> StarFive # bdinfo
> > >>>> boot_params = 0x0000000000000000
> > >>>> DRAM bank = 0x0000000000000000
> > >>>> -> start = 0x0000000040000000
> > >>>> -> size = 0x0000000100000000
> > >>>> flashstart = 0x0000000000000000
> > >>>> flashsize = 0x0000000000000000
> > >>>> flashoffset = 0x0000000000000000
> > >>>> baudrate = 115200 bps
> > >>>> relocaddr = 0x00000000fff46000
> > >>>> reloc off = 0x00000000bfd46000
> > >>>> Build = 64-bit
> > >>>> current eth = ethernet at 16030000
> > >>>> ethaddr = 6c:cf:39:00:75:63
> > >>>> IP addr = <NULL>
> > >>>> fdt_blob = 0x00000000ff72da10
> > >>>> lmb_dump_all:
> > >>>> memory.count = 0x1
> > >>>> memory[0] [0x40000000-0x13fffffff], 0x100000000 bytes, flags: none
> > >>>> reserved.count = 0x3
> > >>>> reserved[0] [0x40000000-0x4005ffff], 0x60000 bytes, flags: no-map
> > >>>> reserved[1] [0xfe72d620-0xffffffff], 0x18d29e0 bytes, flags: no-overwrite
> > >>>> reserved[2] [0x13fffb000-0x13fffffff], 0x5000 bytes, flags:
> > >>>> no-notify, no-overwrite
> > >>>> devicetree = board
> > >>>> serial addr = 0x0000000010000000
> > >>>> width = 0x0000000000000004
> > >>>> shift = 0x0000000000000002
> > >>>> offset = 0x0000000000000000
> > >>>> clock = 0x00000000016e3600
> > >>>> boot hart = 0x0000000000000001
> > >>>> firmware fdt= 0x0000000042200000
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Differences in bdinfo output between working (parent of the
> > >>>> regression) and non-working (origin/master) version:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -fdt_blob = 0x00000000ff72da20
> > >>>> +fdt_blob = 0x00000000ff72da10
> > >>>> lmb_dump_all:
> > >>>> memory.count = 0x1
> > >>>> - memory[0] [0x40000000-0x13fffffff], 0x100000000 bytes flags: none
> > >>>> - reserved.count = 0x2
> > >>>> - reserved[0] [0x40000000-0x4005ffff], 0x00060000 bytes flags: no-map
> > >>>> - reserved[1] [0xfe729630-0xffffffff], 0x018d69d0 bytes flags: no-overwrite
> > >>>> + memory[0] [0x40000000-0x13fffffff], 0x100000000 bytes, flags: none
> > >>>> + reserved.count = 0x3
> > >>>> + reserved[0] [0x40000000-0x4005ffff], 0x60000 bytes, flags: no-map
> > >>>> + reserved[1] [0xfe72d620-0xffffffff], 0x18d29e0 bytes, flags: no-overwrite
> > >>>> + reserved[2] [0x13fffb000-0x13fffffff], 0x5000 bytes, flags:
> > >>>> no-notify, no-overwrite
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2) do you get any errors when running the 'bootefi bootmgr' command
> > >>>>> other than what you mention above
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> U-Boot SPL 2024.10-00989-geb052cbb896f (Nov 19 2024 - 14:39:43 -0800)
> > >>>> ...
> > >>>> StarFive # bootefi bootmgr
> > >>>> Booting: mmc 0
> > >>>> error: no suitable video mode found.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> U-Boot SPL 2025.01-rc2-00129-g7fe55182d926 (Nov 19 2024 - 19:56:55 -0800)
> > >>>> ...
> > >>>> StarFive # bootefi bootmgr
> > >>>> Card did not respond to voltage select! : -110
> > >>>> Not a PE-COFF file
> > >>>> Loading Boot0000 'mmc 0' failed
> > >>>> Loading Boot0001 'nvme 0' failed
> > >>>> EFI boot manager: Cannot load any image
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> 3) What exactly do you mean by "global EFI boot is successful"
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I don't know what the correct name of it is. EFI can boot with what I
> > >>>> am labeling as global EFI boot and searching for fixed path names (?),
> > >>>> or I guess it can decide from EFI variables what to do which I
> > >>>> consider to be the user-configured EFI boot. One of these (the
> > >>>> user-configured EFI boot) is broken since the regression.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> U-Boot SPL 2024.10-00989-geb052cbb896f (Nov 19 2024 - 14:39:43 -0800)
> > >>>> ...
> > >>>> Card did not respond to voltage select! : -110
> > >>>> Failed to load EFI variables
> > >>>> ** Booting bootflow '<NULL>' with efi_mgr
> > >>>> Booting: mmc 0
> > >>>> error: no suitable video mode found.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> U-Boot SPL 2025.01-rc2-00129-g7fe55182d926 (Nov 19 2024 - 19:56:55 -0800)
> > >>>> ...
> > >>>> Card did not respond to voltage select! : -110
> > >>>> Failed to load EFI variables
> > >>>> ** Booting bootflow '<NULL>' with efi_mgr
> > >>>> Not a PE-COFF file
> > >>>> Loading Boot0000 'mmc 0' failed
> > >>>> Loading Boot0001 'nvme 0' failed
> > >>>> EFI boot manager: Cannot load any image
> > >>>> Boot failed (err=-14)
> > >>>> ** Booting bootflow 'mmc at 16010000.bootdev.part_1' with efi
> > >>>> Booting /\EFI\BOOT\BOOTRISCV64.EFI
> > >>>> error: no suitable video mode found.
> > >>>
> > >>> Based on the logs above, it seems like you are booting using the
> > >>> bootmeth efi_mgr? If so, can you try disabling the bootstd config. I
> > >>> might be wrong, but I remember some issues with the bootstd efi_mgr
> > >>> method on some other platform. Also, are you available on irc?
> > >>>
> > >>> -sughosh
> > >>>
> > >>>>> -sughosh
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> For context, the Star64 eMMC contains here an installed Debian Linux
> > >>>>>> OS in the usual way with Grub2 EFI on the EFI System Partition there,
> > >>>>>> and that image boots fine from U-Boot v2024.10 also when loaded into
> > >>>>>> memory and using 'bootefi' directly on that memory address.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -E Shattow
> > >>
> > >> Confirming that some discussion about this happened off-list with a
> > >> positive result and now awaiting a fix.
> > >
> > > I tried to reproduce this issue on the qemu arm64 virt platform, with
> > > 4GB of DRAM memory starting from 0x4000_0000 - 0x1_4000_0000. This is
> > > the exact same memory map for DRAM memory as on your board. I also
> > > modified the value of ram_top to 4GB, as on your board. But I am
> > > unable to hit this on the qemu arm64 platform when I try to boot the
> > > Debian image with 'bootefi bootmgr' command. The only difference that
> > > I see is that on the qemu emulator, the OS is on a virtio disk, as
> > > against mmc in your case. So I think we should try to get to the root
> > > cause of this. I think you mentioned on irc yesterday that you observe
> > > this on two boards, so there is definitely something going on here.
> > >
> > > -sughosh
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Thanks very much! -E
> >
> > Hello Eric,
> >
> > I reproduced the issue you had with the Debian installer on a Pine64
> > Star64 with 8 GiB.
> >
> > try_load_from_media: file_path =
> > /VenHw(e61d73b9-a384-4acc-aeab-82e828f3628b,0000000000000000)/VenHw(e61d73b9-a384-4acc-aeab-82e828f3628b,6d00000000000000)/SD(1)/SD(1)
> > no file name present, try default file
> > try_load_from_media: final_dp =
> > /VenHw(e61d73b9-a384-4acc-aeab-82e828f3628b,0000000000000000)/VenHw(e61d73b9-a384-4acc-aeab-82e828f3628b,6d00000000000000)/SD(1)/SD(1)/HD(2,0x01,0,0x1da800,0x1000)/\EFI\BOOT\BOOTRISCV64.EFI
> > efi_load_image_from_file: buffer 0x23feab000, size 0x11d000
> > efi_load_pe: efi 0x000000023feab000, size 0x11d000
> > Not a PE-COFF file
> > Loading Boot0000 'mmc 1' failed
> > EFI boot manager: Cannot load any image
> > Boot failed (err=-14)
> > Card did not respond to voltage select! : -110
> > ** Booting bootflow 'mmc at 16020000.bootdev.part_2' with efi
> > efi_install_fdt: fdt copied to 0x000000023ffba000
> > Booting /\EFI\BOOT\BOOTRISCV64.EFI
> > efi_load_pe: efi 0x0000000040200000, size 0x11d000
> > error: no such device: /.disk/info.
> >
> > So loading to high memory fails though CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER is enabled.
> >
> > With CONFIG_EFI_LOADER_BOUNCE_BUFFER=y booting the Debian installer
> > image succeeds.
> >
> > In efi_disk.c we call disk_blk_read(). But CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER is only
> > evaluated in blk_read() same for write. This should be changed.
> >
> > CONFIG_EFI_LOADER_BOUNCE_BUFFER should not depend on an architecture.
> >
> > @Hal, @Minda
> > The MMC driver not supporting addresses over 4GiB, is this due to a
> > hardware deficiency or can that be fixed in the U-Boot driver?
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Heinrich
> >
> >
>
> A combination of these two series remedy this issue:
>
> "configs: JH7110: enable EFI_LOADER_BOUNCE_BUFFER"
> "bouncebuf: Allow allocation from U-Boot heap"
>
> Tested on 4GB Milk-V Mars CM Lite, 8GB Milk-V Mars CM Lite WiFi, 4GB
> Pine64 Star64.
>
> Sughosh can you please add to your series my Tested-by: E Shattow
> <lucent at gmail.com>
>
...
>
> -E
Postscript I'm getting failure when 'load mmc' a large file, but
success 'load mmc' a small file. Same applies for 'bootefi bootmgr'
whatever file access it is making.
Okay admittedly I am frustrated and confused what is our testing
methodology here? I don't actually know what is broken (something
unspecified in an mmc driver) and what we are fixing (preventing the
new behavior which does not agree with the old driver - how?).
The problem appears to be a broken mmc implementation and we are not
fixing that by these buffering tricks.
-E
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list