[PATCH v2 0/8] bootstd: sunxi: Migrate to standard boot
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Tue Oct 1 15:06:44 CEST 2024
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 06:23, Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at cherry.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Mattijs, Simon,
>
> On 10/1/24 2:07 PM, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On mar., oct. 01, 2024 at 05:18, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 at 14:48, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This series attempts to migrate all sunxi boards to use standard boot,
> >>> along with a text environment.
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> - Add new patch to resolve BOOTSTD->BLK recursion with Kconfig
> >>> - Put the FEL bootmeth before all other global bootmeths
> >>> - Convert the other DISTRO_DEFAULTS in the Kconfig too
> >>> - Keep BOOTCMD_SUNXI_COMPAT
> >>> - Keep bootcmd_sunxi_compat if OLD_SUNXI_KERNEL_COMPAT is enabled
> >>>
> >>> Simon Glass (8):
> >>> blk: Make functions available unconditionally
> >>> bootstd: Avoid calling unavailable block functions
> >>> bootstd: Avoid depending on BLK
> >>> sunxi: Add a bootmeth for FEL
> >>> sunxi: Move to bootstd
> >>> sunxi: Drop old distro boot variables
> >>> env: Provide a work-around for unquoting fdtfile
> >>> sunxi: Move to text environment
> >>>
> >>> Makefile | 1 +
> >>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 10 +-
> >>> board/sunxi/sunxi.env | 152 +++++++++++
> >>> boot/Kconfig | 16 +-
> >>> boot/Makefile | 1 +
> >>> boot/bootdev-uclass.c | 3 +
> >>> boot/bootmeth_fel.c | 81 ++++++
> >>> .../gardena-smart-gateway-mt7688_defconfig | 1 +
> >>> doc/usage/environment.rst | 12 +
> >>> include/blk.h | 9 +-
> >>> include/configs/sunxi-common.h | 238 ------------------
> >>> 11 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 246 deletions(-)
> >>> create mode 100644 board/sunxi/sunxi.env
> >>> create mode 100644 boot/bootmeth_fel.c
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 2.34.1
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'm just checking on this series. Are there any comments, or can it be applied?
> >
> > Quentin mentioned a typo in patch 3/8, see:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/1f963aa8-948a-4657-9f1b-a3bc38df4714@cherry.de/
> >
>
> Well, is it really a typo or was this still a WIP patch that made it to
> the ML somehow? That was basically the "question" or concern about "wip"
> appearing in the commit log :)
It was an ex-wip patch which I modified and failed to remove the
'wip'. It was fixed in v3[1] (which I now see that I should have
replied to here)
Regards,
SImon
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240901222734.462334-4-sjg@chromium.org/
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list