[PATCH v6 08/12] efi_loader: Disable ANSI output for tests

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Sun Oct 13 21:33:32 CEST 2024


Hi Tom,

On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 16:28, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 04:16:28PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > Hi Heinrich, Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 16:18, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de> wrote:
> [snip]
> > > The relevant error message is:
> > >
> > >      E   Exception: Bad pattern found on console: spl_signon
> > >
> > > The error occurs because the substring
> > >
> > >      U-Boot SPL 2024.10
> > >
> > > occurs multiple times during the reboot process. This is not expected in
> > > wait_for_boot_prompt().
> > >
> > > The EFI test is resetting the board and then calling restart_uboot()
> > > which by itself does another reset.
> >
> > We had this discussion a while back and I was very-much opposed to
> > restarting U-Boot within a test. It has set a bad precedent and now
> > several tests do it.
> >
> > This is another EFI thing that I would like to resolve at some point.
> > As previously mentioned, I understand we might be one test to check
> > that U-Boot does actually kick up a firmware update when started, but
> > I don't think we should be restarting willy-nilly.
>
> We should indeed not be restarting willy-nilly. And we don't. But the
> test for "can we restart the system" must restart the system. That's the
> test. It's not changing. Testing if we can restart the system by faking
> the restart is not testing restarting the system.

If it were just one test I would be OK with it...but it has spread,
unfortunately. When I run under gdb I constantly have to manually
restart U-Boot.

Regards,
SImon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list