[PATCH v3 11/15] layerscape: use the lmb API's to add RAM memory
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Mon Oct 14 17:50:51 CEST 2024
Hi Sughosh,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 at 04:56, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> The EFI memory allocations are now being done through the LMB module,
> and hence the memory map is maintained by the LMB module. Use the
> lmb_arch_add_memory() API function to add the usable RAM memory to the
> LMB's memory map.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org>
> ---
> Changes since V2: None
>
> arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c | 8 ++++----
> lib/Kconfig | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c
> index f9c2083677..d2d3e346a3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <env.h>
> #include <init.h>
> #include <hang.h>
> +#include <lmb.h>
> #include <log.h>
> #include <net.h>
> #include <vsprintf.h>
> @@ -1525,8 +1526,8 @@ int dram_init_banksize(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_LOADER)
> -void efi_add_known_memory(void)
> +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(LMB_ARCH_MEM_MAP)
> +void lmb_arch_add_memory(void)
> {
> int i;
> phys_addr_t ram_start;
> @@ -1548,8 +1549,7 @@ void efi_add_known_memory(void)
> gd->arch.resv_ram < ram_start + ram_size)just
> ram_size = gd->arch.resv_ram - ram_start;
> #endif
> - efi_add_memory_map(ram_start, ram_size,
> - EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY);
> + lmb_add(ram_start, ram_size);
But isn't RAM added to lmb anyway? I understand the call-removal but
why the lmb_add() ?
> }
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
> index 100c4e5c25..3796adc453 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig
> @@ -1135,6 +1135,7 @@ config SPL_LMB
> config LMB_ARCH_MEM_MAP
> bool "Add an architecture specific memory map"
> depends on LMB
> + default y if FSL_LAYERSCAPE
This should use an event.
> help
> Some architectures have special or unique aspects which need
> consideration when adding memory ranges to the list of available
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list