[PATCH 1/6] memory: ti-aemif: Correct macro to ensure avoiding precedence issues

[Bastien Curutchet]

Fix following CHECK pointed out by checkpatch:

   CHECK: Macro argument 'cs' may be better as '(cs)' to avoid precedence issues
   #62: FILE: drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c:15:
   +#define AEMIF_CONFIG(cs)               (0x10 + (cs * 4))

Signed-off-by: Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet at bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c b/drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c
index 29131f536a..127a262894 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 #define AEMIF_WAITCYCLE_CONFIG		(KS2_AEMIF_CNTRL_BASE + 0x4)
 #define AEMIF_NAND_CONTROL		(KS2_AEMIF_CNTRL_BASE + 0x60)
 #define AEMIF_ONENAND_CONTROL		(KS2_AEMIF_CNTRL_BASE + 0x5c)
-#define AEMIF_CONFIG(cs)		(KS2_AEMIF_CNTRL_BASE + 0x10 + (cs * 4))
+#define AEMIF_CONFIG(cs)		(KS2_AEMIF_CNTRL_BASE + 0x10 + ((cs) * 4))
 
 #define AEMIF_CFG_SELECT_STROBE(v)	((v) ? 1 << 31 : 0)
 #define AEMIF_CFG_EXTEND_WAIT(v)	((v) ? 1 << 30 : 0)
-- 
2.47.0