[PATCH v2 00/25] led: Remove old status-LED code

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Tue Oct 22 19:29:12 CEST 2024


On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 07:00:46PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 16:02, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:15:34PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 19:26, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 01:38:08PM +0200, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > > There has been an LED framework in U-Boot which uses driver model for
> > > > > about 9 years now. Recent work is underway to improve it and provide
> > > > > more features. It is probably a good time to drop the old code, which
> > > > > is only used by 5 boards:
> > > > >
> > > > >    ./tools/qconfig.py -f LED_STATUS
> > > > >    5 matches
> > > > >    eb_cpu5282 eb_cpu5282_internal mx23_olinuxino pinephone
> > > > >    socfpga_vining_fpga
> > > > >
> > > > > This series attempts that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > > - Combine code-removal and defconfig changes
> > > > > - Add a patch to enable LED and LED_BOOT for these boards
> > > > > - Add a patch to enable LED and LED_BOOT for these boards
> > > > > - Enable LED on the 5 affected platforms
> > > > > - Reorder patches for bisectability
> > > >
> > > > So I believe this means you missed the feedback of just doing the blind
> > > > migration rather than disabling the feature, like we used to often do
> > > > for cases where it's just a matter of changing CONFIG options. It
> > > > should:
> > > > - Not introduce a failure to build
> > > > - Just work on platforms with either OF_UPSTREAM or semi-recent device
> > > >   trees
> > > > - Just start working on those platforms when they do move to
> > > >   OF_UPSTREAM.
> > >
> > > Perhaps I didn't understand what you were saying. I thought you meant
> > > to enable LED and LED_BOOT on these 5 boards?
> >
> > Ah, OK, I see the disconnects now, sorry. The first comment I saw was
> > Marek's on patch #2. So yes, along with Peter's request instead of one
> > commit to disable and another commit to enable, just do 5 commits to
> > migrate from one to the other please, thanks.
> 
> In order to maintain bisectability I need to delete some code in each
> of those commits. But if that is OK, then yes, I believe this is
> possible.

Yes, thanks.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20241022/051312e3/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list