[PATCH v4 2/8] ram: k3-ddrss: Add k3_ddrss_ddr_bank_base_size_calc() to solve 'calculations restricted to 32 bits' issue

Neha Malcom Francis n-francis at ti.com
Thu Oct 24 06:01:13 CEST 2024


Hi Bryan

On 23/10/24 20:09, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> On October 21, 2024 thus sayeth Santhosh Kumar K:
>> As R5 is a 32 bit processor, the RAM banks' base and size calculation
>> is restricted to 32 bits, which results in wrong values if bank's base
>> is greater than 32 bits or bank's size is greater than or equal to 4GB.
>>
>> So, add k3_ddrss_ddr_bank_base_size_calc() to get the base address and
>> size of RAM's banks from the device tree memory node, and store in a
>> 64 bit device private data which can be used for ECC reserved memory
>> calculation, Setting ECC range and Fixing up bank size in device tree
>> when ECC is enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6 at ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/ram/k3-ddrss/k3-ddrss.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>   1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ram/k3-ddrss/k3-ddrss.c b/drivers/ram/k3-ddrss/k3-ddrss.c
>> index f2ab8cf2b49b..bd6783ebc2cd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ram/k3-ddrss/k3-ddrss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ram/k3-ddrss/k3-ddrss.c
>> @@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ struct k3_ddrss_desc {
>>   	struct k3_ddrss_ecc_region ecc_regions[K3_DDRSS_MAX_ECC_REGIONS];
>>   	u64 ecc_reserved_space;
>>   	bool ti_ecc_enabled;
>> +	unsigned long long ddr_bank_base[CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS];
>> +	unsigned long long ddr_bank_size[CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS];
>> +	unsigned long long ddr_ram_size;
> 
> Should we use the u64 typedef here?
> 
>>   };
>>   
>>   struct reginitdata {
>> @@ -668,11 +671,54 @@ static void k3_ddrss_lpddr4_preload_full_mem(struct k3_ddrss_desc *ddrss,
>>   	printf("ECC: priming DDR completed in %lu msec\n", get_timer(done));
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void k3_ddrss_ddr_bank_base_size_calc(struct k3_ddrss_desc *ddrss)
>> +{
>> +	int bank, na, ns, len, parent;
>> +	const fdt32_t *ptr, *end;
>> +
>> +	for (bank = 0; bank < CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS; bank++) {
>> +		ddrss->ddr_bank_base[bank] = 0;
>> +		ddrss->ddr_bank_size[bank] = 0;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ofnode mem = ofnode_null();
>> +
>> +	do {
>> +		mem = ofnode_by_prop_value(mem, "device_type", "memory", 7);
>> +	} while (!ofnode_is_enabled(mem));
>> +
>> +	const void *fdt = ofnode_to_fdt(mem);
>> +	int node = ofnode_to_offset(mem);
>> +	const char *property = "reg";
>> +
>> +	parent = fdt_parent_offset(fdt, node);
>> +	na = fdt_address_cells(fdt, parent);
>> +	ns = fdt_size_cells(fdt, parent);
>> +	ptr = fdt_getprop(fdt, node, property, &len);
>> +	end = ptr + len / sizeof(*ptr);
>> +
>> +	for (bank = 0; bank < CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS; bank++) {
>> +		if (ptr + na + ns <= end) {
>> +			if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_TRANSLATE))
>> +				ddrss->ddr_bank_base[bank] = fdt_translate_address(fdt, node, ptr);
>> +			else
>> +				ddrss->ddr_bank_base[bank] = fdtdec_get_number(ptr, na);
>> +
>> +			ddrss->ddr_bank_size[bank] = fdtdec_get_number(&ptr[na], ns);
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		ptr += na + ns;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	for (bank = 0; bank < CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS; bank++)
>> +		ddrss->ddr_ram_size += ddrss->ddr_bank_size[bank];
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void k3_ddrss_lpddr4_ecc_calc_reserved_mem(struct k3_ddrss_desc *ddrss)
>>   {
>>   	fdtdec_setup_mem_size_base_lowest();
>>   
>> -	ddrss->ecc_reserved_space = gd->ram_size;
>> +	ddrss->ecc_reserved_space = ddrss->ddr_ram_size;
>>   	do_div(ddrss->ecc_reserved_space, 9);
>>   
>>   	/* Round to clean number */
>> @@ -696,7 +742,7 @@ static void k3_ddrss_lpddr4_ecc_init(struct k3_ddrss_desc *ddrss)
>>   	/* Preload the full memory with 0's using the BIST engine of
>>   	 * the LPDDR4 controller.
>>   	 */
>> -	k3_ddrss_lpddr4_preload_full_mem(ddrss, gd->ram_size, 0);
>> +	k3_ddrss_lpddr4_preload_full_mem(ddrss, ddrss->ddr_ram_size, 0);
>>   
>>   	/* Clear Error Count Register */
>>   	writel(0x1, base + DDRSS_ECC_1B_ERR_CNT_REG);
>> @@ -741,6 +787,8 @@ static int k3_ddrss_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>>   
>>   	k3_lpddr4_start(ddrss);
>>   
>> +	k3_ddrss_ddr_bank_base_size_calc(ddrss);
>> +
>>   	if (ddrss->ti_ecc_enabled) {
>>   		if (!ddrss->ddrss_ss_cfg) {
>>   			printf("%s: ss_cfg is required if ecc is enabled but not provided.",
>> @@ -761,30 +809,24 @@ static int k3_ddrss_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>>   
>>   int k3_ddrss_ddr_fdt_fixup(struct udevice *dev, void *blob, struct bd_info *bd)
>>   {
>> -	struct k3_ddrss_desc *ddrss = dev_get_priv(dev);
>> -	u64 start[CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS];
>> -	u64 size[CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS];
>>   	int bank;
>> +	struct k3_ddrss_desc *ddrss = dev_get_priv(dev);
>>   
>>   	if (ddrss->ecc_reserved_space == 0)
>>   		return 0;
>>   
>>   	for (bank = CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS - 1; bank >= 0; bank--) {
>> -		if (ddrss->ecc_reserved_space > bd->bi_dram[bank].size) {
>> -			ddrss->ecc_reserved_space -= bd->bi_dram[bank].size;
>> -			bd->bi_dram[bank].size = 0;
>> +		if (ddrss->ecc_reserved_space > ddrss->ddr_bank_size[bank]) {
>> +			ddrss->ecc_reserved_space -= ddrss->ddr_bank_size[bank];
>> +			ddrss->ddr_bank_size[bank] = 0;
>>   		} else {
>> -			bd->bi_dram[bank].size -= ddrss->ecc_reserved_space;
>> +			ddrss->ddr_bank_size[bank] -= ddrss->ecc_reserved_space;
>>   			break;
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	for (bank = 0; bank < CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS; bank++) {
>> -		start[bank] =  bd->bi_dram[bank].start;
>> -		size[bank] = bd->bi_dram[bank].size;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	return fdt_fixup_memory_banks(blob, start, size, CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS);
>> +	return fdt_fixup_memory_banks(blob, ddrss->ddr_bank_base,
>> +				      ddrss->ddr_bank_size, CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS);
>>   }
> 
> Have we looked into passing this information via the global data pointer
> rather than fixing up the device tree on each boot phase?
> 
>      https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20180926215520.87168-23-sjg@chromium.org/
> 
> I don't see a clear path to pass GD from SPL to SPL but there is a TPL
> to SPL which I think we should be able to copy.

But we also make use of this to fix up the device tree that passes onto kernel 
as well, I need to look into this patch though. But from a first glance looks 
like we will be able to pass on the information from SPL->SPL (with modification 
as you said) and SPL->U-Boot but U-Boot->Kernel would still require this 
function to be present.

> 
> ~Bryan

-- 
Thanking You
Neha Malcom Francis


More information about the U-Boot mailing list