[PATCH 08/14] net: phy: ksz90x1: Simplify ksz9131_config_rgmii_delay

Marek Vasut marek.vasut at mailbox.org
Sun Oct 27 17:20:29 CET 2024


On 10/24/24 5:24 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
> We can call phy_modify_mmd() instead of manually calling drv->readext()
> and drv->writeext().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct at bp.renesas.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/phy/micrel_ksz90x1.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel_ksz90x1.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel_ksz90x1.c
> index b64046e0bc72..6515d8feb9be 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel_ksz90x1.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel_ksz90x1.c
> @@ -502,8 +502,7 @@ static int ksz9131_of_load_all_skew_values(struct phy_device *phydev)
>   
>   static int ksz9131_config_rgmii_delay(struct phy_device *phydev)
>   {
> -	struct phy_driver *drv = phydev->drv;
> -	u16 rxcdll_val, txcdll_val, val;
> +	u16 rxcdll_val, txcdll_val;
>   	int ret;
>   
>   	switch (phydev->interface) {
> @@ -527,24 +526,15 @@ static int ksz9131_config_rgmii_delay(struct phy_device *phydev)
>   		return 0;
>   	}
>   
> -	val = drv->readext(phydev, 0, KSZ9131RN_MMD_COMMON_CTRL_REG,
> -			   KSZ9131RN_RXC_DLL_CTRL);
> -	val &= ~KSZ9131RN_DLL_CTRL_BYPASS;
> -	val |= rxcdll_val;
> -	ret = drv->writeext(phydev, 0, KSZ9131RN_MMD_COMMON_CTRL_REG,
> -			    KSZ9131RN_RXC_DLL_CTRL, val);
> -	if (ret)
> +	ret = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, KSZ9131RN_MMD_COMMON_CTRL_REG,
> +			     KSZ9131RN_RXC_DLL_CTRL, KSZ9131RN_DLL_CTRL_BYPASS,
> +			     rxcdll_val);
> +	if (ret < 0)
>   		return ret;
>   
> -	val = drv->readext(phydev, 0, KSZ9131RN_MMD_COMMON_CTRL_REG,
> -			   KSZ9131RN_TXC_DLL_CTRL);
> -
> -	val &= ~KSZ9131RN_DLL_CTRL_BYPASS;
> -	val |= txcdll_val;
> -	ret = drv->writeext(phydev, 0, KSZ9131RN_MMD_COMMON_CTRL_REG,
> -			    KSZ9131RN_TXC_DLL_CTRL, val);
> -
> -	return ret;
> +	return phy_modify_mmd(phydev, KSZ9131RN_MMD_COMMON_CTRL_REG,
> +			      KSZ9131RN_TXC_DLL_CTRL, KSZ9131RN_DLL_CTRL_BYPASS,
> +			      txcdll_val);
>   }
Can't you set both bitfields at the same time ? They seem to be in the 
same register.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list