[PATCH v7 05/11] test: Introduce lab mode
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Thu Oct 31 19:02:03 CET 2024
Hi Tom,
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 00:53, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 07:51:39PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > There is quite a bit of code in pytest to try to start up U-Boot on a
> > board, with timeouts, expects, etc.
> >
> > This is tedious to maintain and is peripheral to the test system's
> > purpose. It seems better to put this logic in the lab itself, where is
> > can provide such support.
> >
> > With Labgrid we can use the UbootStrategy class to get the board into a
> > useful state, however it needs to do it. Then it can report to pytest
> > by writing a suitable string along with the U-Boot version it detected.
> >
> > Add support for detecting 'lab mode' and simply assume that all is well
> > in that case. Collect the version string when Labgrid says it is ready.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>
> First, I worry that this kind of change will make verifying boards can
> reset harder, not easier. But second, taking the "tedious" part and
> putting in another project's config file instead makes it no less
> "tedious". If I follow the labgrid code right, it's got the same kind of
> "check for a string" that we have, except it's not caring about the
> correct number / order of banner prints. Which I find worrisome and a
> problem because of the times I've caught "oops, didn't actually test the
> right stuff" because that was wrong.
I am not asking you to use this Labgrid integration., though Please
feel free to do things as you currently do. For me, this works very
well and avoids the persistent failures I was otherwise seeing.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list