[PATCH 1/2] riscv: Add Kconfig options to distinguish Zaamo and Zalrsc
Yao Zi
ziyao at disroot.org
Sun Aug 3 05:28:25 CEST 2025
On Sun, Aug 03, 2025 at 09:24:22AM +0800, Yixun Lan wrote:
> Hi Yao,
>
> On 09:21 Sat 02 Aug , Yao Zi wrote:
> > Ratified on Apr. 2024, the original RISC-V "A" extension is now split
> > into two separate extensions, "Zaamo" for atomic operations and "Zalrsc"
> > for load-reserved/store-conditional instructions.
> >
> > For now, we've already seen real-world designs implement the Zalrsc
> > extension only[2]. As U-Boot mainly runs with only one HART, we could
> > easily support these designs by not using AMO instructions in the
> > hard-written assembly if necessary, for which this patch introduces two
> > new Kconfig options to indicate the availability of "Zaamo" and "Zalrsc".
> >
> > Note that even with this patch, "A" extension is specified in the ISA
> > string passed to the compiler as long as one of "Zaamo" or "Zalrsc" is
> > available, since they're only recognized with a quite recent version of
> > GCC/Clang. The compiler usually doesn't automatically generate atomic
> > instructions unless the source explicitly instructs it to do so, thus
> > this should be safe.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-zaamo-zalrsc/commit/d94c64c63e9120d56bdeb540caf2e5dae60a8126 # [1]
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20250729162035.209849-9-uros.stajic@htecgroup.com/ # [2]
> > Signed-off-by: Yao Zi <ziyao at disroot.org>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/Makefile | 7 ++++++-
> > configs/ibex-ast2700_defconfig | 3 ++-
> > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index 8c6feae5735..b1c2d657e99 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -339,10 +339,27 @@ endmenu
> >
> > config RISCV_ISA_A
> > bool "Standard extension for Atomic Instructions"
> > + depends on RISCV_ISA_ZAAMO && RISCV_ISA_ZALRSC
> > default y
> > help
> > Adds "A" to the ISA string passed to the compiler.
> >
> > +config RISCV_ISA_ZAAMO
> > + bool "Standard extension for Atomic Memory Operations"
> > + default y
> > + help
> > + Indicates the platform supports Zaamo extension for atomic memory
> > + operations. Assembly routines won't use AMO instructions if set
> > + to n.
> > +
> > +config RISCV_ISA_ZALRSC
> > + bool "Standard extension for LR/SC instructions"
> > + default y
> > + help
> > + Indicates the platform supports Zalrsc extension for load-reserved
> > + and store-conditional instructions. Assembly rutines won't use
> > + LR/SC instructions if set to n.
> > +
> > config RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> > bool "Zicbom support"
> > depends on !SYS_DISABLE_DCACHE_OPS
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Makefile b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> > index 6f80f4a7108..fdda6da1df3 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> > @@ -11,7 +11,12 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_RV32I),y)
> > ARCH_BASE = rv32im
> > ABI_BASE = ilp32
> > endif
> > -ifeq ($(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_A),y)
> > +# GCC starts to recognize "Zaamo" and "Zalrsc" from version 15, which is quite
> > +# recent. We don't bother checking the exact compiler version, but pass "A"
> > +# extension for -march as long as one of "Zaamo" or "Zalrsc" is available.
> > +ifeq ($(findstring y,$(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_A) \
> > + $(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZAAMO) \
> > + $(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZALRSC)),y)
> > ARCH_A = a
> > endif
> > ifeq ($(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_F),y)
> > diff --git a/configs/ibex-ast2700_defconfig b/configs/ibex-ast2700_defconfig
> > index f088aec8716..eb5cab43645 100644
> > --- a/configs/ibex-ast2700_defconfig
> > +++ b/configs/ibex-ast2700_defconfig
> > @@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ CONFIG_SYS_MEM_TOP_HIDE=0x10000000
> > CONFIG_BUILD_TARGET=""
> > CONFIG_TARGET_ASPEED_AST2700_IBEX=y
> > # CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_F is not set
> > -# CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_A is not set
> > +# CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZAAMO is not set
> > +# CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZALRSC is not set
>
> this is confusing, while in this patchset it actually equal to :
> # CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZAAMO is not set
> CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZALRSC=y
No, ibex-ast2700_defconfig enables XIP and SPL_XIP, thus isn't affected
by the change of the second patch. This defconfig change is only for
ensuring the march string passed to CC doesn't contain "A" extension
just as what has been done previously, which may help find out possible
breakages to the board as early as possible in the future, since it's
the only existing board that doesn't support A extension.
> also I believe changes for configs/ibex-ast2700_defconfig should go as
> an independent patch, please separate it
At my very first glance, I was worried about behavior changes for the
board: as you can see, what is passed as march affects the content of
.riscv.attributes section in the result ELF file, and if we disable
RISCV_ISA_ZA{AMO,LRSC} in a separate patch, "A" will be included in the
ISA string before it gets applied.
This seems to be somehow farsight and I'll separate the change into
another patch.
Best regards,
Yao Zi
> > # CONFIG_SPL_SMP is not set
> > CONFIG_XIP=y
> > CONFIG_SPL_XIP=y
> > --
> > 2.50.1
> >
>
> --
> Yixun Lan (dlan)
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list