[PATCH v1 1/2] dma: ti: k3-udma: fix dma_addr_t typecasts

[Anshul Dalal]

Hi Prasanth,

On Wed Aug 27, 2025 at 9:44 PM IST, Prasanth Mantena wrote:
> Hi Anshul,
> On 19:02, Anshul Dalal wrote:
>> With the change to dma_addr_t from u32 to u64 for the R5 SPL, the
>
> From above line, Does this patch meant to after patch 2/2 ?
>
>> existing typecasts from void* to int or vice-versa cause the compiler to
>> throw a "cast from pointer to integer of different size".
>> 
>> Therefore this patch changes the casts to a uintptr_t which is
>> guaranteed to hold any pointer value, thus supressing the compiler
>> warning.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Anshul Dalal <anshuld at ti.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> index 723265ab2e5..01824310995 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> @@ -2327,7 +2327,7 @@ static int udma_send(struct dma *dma, void *src, size_t len, void *metadata)
>>  {
>>  	struct udma_dev *ud = dev_get_priv(dma->dev);
>>  	struct cppi5_host_desc_t *desc_tx;
>> -	dma_addr_t dma_src = (dma_addr_t)src;
>> +	dma_addr_t dma_src = (uintptr_t)src;
>
> Considering after the dma_addr_t changed to u64, please help me understand what
> warning does the above change fix.
>

This patch was meant to prevent warnings from the last patch of the
series, though I understand the confusion here. I will reword the commit
description to be more clear in v2.

Thanks,
Anshul