[PATCH] arch: arm: mach-socfpga: misc: improve help text and usage examples

[Maniyam, Dinesh]

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at mailbox.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2025 4:50 pm
> To: Maniyam, Dinesh <dinesh.maniyam at altera.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Cc: Simon <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com>; Simon Glass
> <sjg at chromium.org>; Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>; Chee, Tien Fong
> <tien.fong.chee at altera.com>; Hea, Kok Kiang <kok.kiang.hea at altera.com>; Ng,
> Boon Khai <boon.khai.ng at altera.com>; Yuslaimi, Alif Zakuan
> <alif.zakuan.yuslaimi at altera.com>; Lim, Jit Loon <jit.loon.lim at altera.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: arm: mach-socfpga: misc: improve help text and usage
> examples
> 
> [CAUTION: This email is from outside your organization. Unless you trust the
> sender, do not click on links or open attachments as it may be a fraudulent email
> attempting to steal your information and/or compromise your computer.]
> 
> On 8/21/25 5:35 AM, dinesh.maniyam at altera.com wrote:
> > From: Dinesh Maniyam <dinesh.maniyam at altera.com>
> >
> > The existing 'bridge' command help was incomplete and contained a
> > spelling error. This patch updates the help text to clearly describe
> > the available bridge bit positions and their corresponding masks:
> 
> The command was primarily written for CV/AV , that's why it was incomplete for
> newer SoCs. Instead of the bit handling, why not add support for symbolic name
> handling instead ?
> 
> Add 'bridge list' to print supported bridges per SoC.
> 
> Add 'bridge set' which handles bridge=state parameters, e.g. 'bridge set
> h2f=1 f2h=0 ...'. That will be future proof and scale.

I get the point, improving the bridges command will help to support newer
SoCs. Let me work on it.

Thanks
Dinesh