[PATCH 11/32] efi: x86: Rework VENDOR_EFI option to permit other archs

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 05:38:27PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 13:08, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:42:04AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > At present only x86 supports the EFI app and (apart from Qualcomm) the
> > > payload. In preparation for supporting ARM more generally, rename the
> > > existing VENDOR_EFI option to VENDOR_EFI_X86, using that to define a
> > > generic VENDOR_EFI which will be enabled for all architectures.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >
> > This looks like things that should just live under
> > BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS in board/efi/Kconfig instead.
> 
> I don't really understand what you are getting at there.
> 
> That directory is for boards, but it seems that EFI is going to grow
> from just being a set of boards, e.g. with board/qualcomm also having
> an EFI-payload build.

We shouldn't need VENDOR_EFI_FOO, we should likely (a) drop VENDOR_ as
that's an x86'ism and then place more things as needed under
lib/efi/Kconfig. Especially if we're going to have (really?) end up with
per-SoC efi app builds for arm64, rather than something generic.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20250203/7d2af204/attachment.sig>