[PATCH v2 00/29] arm: Support building as an EFI app

[Simon Glass]

Hi Tom,

On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 at 14:29, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 10:11:20AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Depend on CONFIG_EFI_APP instead
> > - Drop change to u-boot-elf rule
> > - Mention '64-bit ARM' here, rather than just 'ARM'
> > - Drop the word 'Sadly'
> > - Mention '64-bit ARM' here, rather than just 'ARM'
> > - Add new patch to rename VENDOR_EFI to ARCH_EFI
> > - Update to use ARCH_EFI instead of VENDOR_EFI
> > - Mention '64-bit ARM' here, rather than just 'ARM'
> > - Mention '64-bit ARM' here, rather than just 'ARM'
> > - Rework the commit message to clarify the relationship to link-scripts
> > - Expand commit message to explains that EFI_APP skips relocation
> > - Mention '64-bit ARM' here, rather than just 'ARM'
> > - Document the x86 field better and add a comment for ARM too
> > - Mention '64-bit ARM' here, rather than just 'ARM'
> > - Put the EFI-app case first in setup_mon_len(), for clarity
> > - Use ARCH_EFI instead of VENDOR_EFI
> > - Merge the linker-script rules into Kconfig in this patch
> > - Drop patch 'Select the EFI linker script for the app'
>
> There's things that were mentioned for v1 that aren't in this list, did
> you miss them or disagree with them?
>

The only one I think I didn't do was ' Drop exception code'. I'm not
actually using / enabling an SPL symbol so I think you have the wrong
end of the stick.

Regards,
SImon