[PATCH 09/17] spl: riscv: opensbi: Error on misaligned FDT

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 2/24/25 06:55, Sam Edwards wrote:
> libfdt 1.6.1+ requires the FDT to be 8-byte aligned and returns an error
> if not. OpenSBI 1.0+ includes this version of libfdt and will also
> reject misaligned FDTs.
>
> However, OpenSBI cannot indicate the error to the user: since it cannot
> access the serial console, it can only silently hang. This can be very
> difficult to diagnose without proper debugging facilities. Therefore,
> give the U-Boot SPL, which *can* print error messages, an additional
> check for proper FDT alignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks at gmail.com>
> ---
>   common/spl/spl_opensbi.c | 5 +++++
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_opensbi.c b/common/spl/spl_opensbi.c
> index 5a26d7c31a4..0ed6afeacc6 100644
> --- a/common/spl/spl_opensbi.c
> +++ b/common/spl/spl_opensbi.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,11 @@ void __noreturn spl_invoke_opensbi(struct spl_image_info *spl_image)
>   		hang();
>   	}
>
> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)spl_image->fdt_addr, 8)) {
> +		pr_err("SPL image loaded an improperly-aligned device tree\n");

We only use pr_err() in drivers when we copy code from Linux. Otherwise
use log_err().

As this code is for RISC-V, this patch should have been sent to the
RISC-V maintainers.

cc: Leo, Rick

SPL size is very restricted on boards where it is responsible for
initializing DRAM and therefore has to fit into cache. We should only
add code that is strictly needed to SPL.

What makes you think that this problem can realistically occur?

Best regards

Heinrich

> +		hang();
> +	}
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Originally, u-boot-spl will place DTB directly after the kernel,
>   	 * but the size of the kernel did not include the BSS section, which