[PATCH 1/3] bootstd: Fix memleak on errors in bootmeth_setup_iter_order()

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 09:41:07PM -0500, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 5:35 PM Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > >
> > > Is it possible to just apply this patch without a test? It's clearly
> > > fixing a memleak. Not that I'm lazy or anything, I came up with a test
> > > like below, but I don't want to send something that is quite hard to
> > > test. If you think this test is really essential, I can send it once
> > > bootstd tests are fixed and can be run in one command without any
> > > extra non-documented work.
> > >
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >
> > Yes, we can do this in a follow-up I think. I'll take this series to
> > -next soon.
> >
> 
> Thanks Tom! It's not very recent though, should I rebase it and re-submit?

It still applies fine, thanks.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20250620/06a30e6a/attachment.sig>