[PATCH RFT v3 0/3] fastboot: add support for generic block flashing

[Tom Rini]

On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 04:49:35PM +0200, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
> Hi Neil,
> 
> On mar., mai 20, 2025 at 13:35, Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek at kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 06 May 2025 18:10:06 +0200, neil.armstrong at linaro.org wrote:
> >> This serie permits using any block device as target
> >> for fastboot by moving the generic block logic into
> >> a common set of helpers and also use them as generic
> >> backend.
> >> 
> >> The erase logic has been extended to support software
> >> erase since only 2 block drivers exposes the erase
> >> operation.
> >> 
> >> [...]
> >
> > Thanks, Applied to https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dfu (u-boot-dfu-next)
> >
> > [1/3] fastboot: blk: introduce fastboot block flashing support
> >       https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dfu/-/commit/88239b5bb04bea2b58f7bf4c3ea72cf832de818c
> > [2/3] fastboot: blk: switch emmc to use the block helpers
> >       https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dfu/-/commit/25ab5c32c28b9f25fb193f726f239d75af3c365a
> > [3/3] fastboot: integrate block flashing back-end
> >       https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dfu/-/commit/a885bd8c969e25d03bf406207d89b1145c9490fb
> 
> It seems this series cause CI to fail:
> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dfu/-/pipelines/26238
> 
> Without the patches applied, it passes:
> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dfu/-/pipelines/26235
> 
> Do you have any idea what is going wrong?
> I could not find anything obvious by skimming through the logs.

It's a Kconfig problem then. Some platform is prompting for a value (not
a y/n) and there's no default.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20250521/8e1e52c5/attachment.sig>