Broken boards?

[Tom Rini]

On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 07:05:52PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 14:55, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 09:46:03AM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > It seems that some of the boards in my lab are broken in your tree.
> > > Have you noticed that?
> >
> > Your lab has never fully functioned in mainline, so no I've not paid
> > attention to it and don't use it. I figure it's part of the lab
> > maintainers duties to figure out false failures and
> > more-or-less-expected failures.
> 
> Oh, that's a shame. I didn't know you had stopped using it.

I never used it, since it was never fully green. I thought there was
still some problems with the TPM tests for example on one of your
platforms. I've only poked it in passing when I needed something
specific to your lab.

> I use it on nearly every PR. I did once send a patch to disable the
> boards that were broken, then another to re-enable them, but I don't
> think you took either of them...

No, because iirc at least one of your "broken" boards at the time was
working I think.

> 
> Here's a recent run showing a few problems:
> 
> https://sjg.u-boot.org/u-boot/u-boot/-/pipelines/794
> 
> But x86, RISC-V and some rockchip seem to be broken in your tree.

I wouldn't characterize any of that as broken, just a combination of
lab issues (what Jonas pointed out for rockchip, I don't know when samus
last worked in your lab, no idea about zybo) and expected failures (the
TPM test, probably an incorrect test on pine64, I forget what the
resolution was for vf2).

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20250525/2c4bc8ec/attachment.sig>