[PATCH 1/2] Fix x86 baytrail boot flow.

[Tom Rini]

On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 02:01:58PM +0000, Eric Schikschneit wrote:
> Hello Simon, Tom,
> 
> I am getting back to this and will try to answer your questions the best I can. It has been quite some time since I was deep into this code.
> 
> 1. Tom - 
> > Doing it this way will break other architectures. Can we just call the
> > function needed inside of x86 assembly?
> I suppose we could do something like that. What do you suggest? A new .S assembly file?

If it can't logically be put in an existing one, yes. Or can we just
call the new C function from somewhere in the existing assembly chain?

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20260210/966cdec3/attachment.sig>