[PATCH] usb: Fix timeout check in usb_control_msg
Marek Vasut
marek.vasut at mailbox.org
Mon Feb 23 19:55:28 CET 2026
On 2/23/26 3:20 AM, Ronan Dalton wrote:
> The timeout check after the while loop in the usb_control_msg function
> checks for equality with zero, which is incorrect because timeout will
> actually be -1 after exiting the while loop due to a timeout.
>
> Currently this means that -1 is usually returned by this function when
> -ETIMEDOUT should have been returned instead.
>
> Fix this by comparing timeout with -1 instead. Add a check for
> timeout being negative at the start of the function and return -EINVAL
> in that case, since a negative timeout doesn't make sense either.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ronan Dalton <ronan.dalton at alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> Cc: Philip Oberfichtner <pro at denx.de>
> ---
> common/usb.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/usb.c b/common/usb.c
> index 6a4ad346f4b..2cbc432b131 100644
> --- a/common/usb.c
> +++ b/common/usb.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,9 @@ int usb_control_msg(struct usb_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
> ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER(struct devrequest, setup_packet, 1);
> int err;
>
> + if (timeout < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> if ((timeout == 0) && (!asynch_allowed)) {
> /* request for a asynch control pipe is not allowed */
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -259,7 +262,7 @@ int usb_control_msg(struct usb_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
> mdelay(1);
> }
>
> - if (timeout == 0)
> + if (timeout == -1)
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
Can you convert this poll/timeout sequence to include/linux/iopoll.h
read_poll_timeout() instead , to remove another ad-hoc polling ?
Something like this should work:
"
volatile unsigned long val;
ret = read_poll_timeout((volatile unsigned long), val,
!(val & USB_ST_NOT_PROC), 1000, timeout * 1000, dev->status);
"
usb_bulk_msg() may benefit from similar update.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list