[PATCH v2 1/1] board: zynqmp: add cmd for getting boot auth state

Tomas Melin tomas.melin at vaisala.com
Wed Jan 7 12:14:09 CET 2026


Hi,

On 06/01/2026 18:15, Neal Frager wrote:
> Add command for checking if boot was authenticated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk at foundries.io>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Frager <neal.frager at amd.com>
> ---
> V1->V2:
> - extended zynqmp command with verify_auth sub-command
> - changed return value, so it can be used with scripts
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/zynqmp.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/zynqmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/zynqmp.c
> index c0398a466ff..b15c31919c6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/zynqmp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/zynqmp.c
> @@ -362,6 +362,45 @@ static int do_zynqmp_reboot(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag,
>  	return CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
>  }
>  
> +static bool zynqmp_verify_auth(void)
> +{
> +	u32 status = 0;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = zynqmp_mmio_read((ulong)&csu_base->status, &status);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		printf("Can't obtain boot auth state");
> +		return false;
Using boolean as return value here is not practical as this condition
should rather signal error than return false.

> +	}
> +
> +	return (status & BIT(0));
It would be better to have a named bit here instead.

> +}
> +
> +static int do_zynqmp_verify_auth(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag,
> +				 int argc, char * const argv[])
> +{
> +	u32 status = 0;
No need to init status value here.

> +	int ret;
> +
> +	status = zynqmp_verify_auth();
> +	if (status) {
> +		printf("Boot is authenticated\n");
> +
> +		ret = env_set("zynqmp_auth", "1");
> +		if (ret)
> +			return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> +	} else {
Here it might be that reading reg actually failed, which should return
CMD_RET_FAILURE instead.

> +		printf("Boot is not authenticated\n");
> +
> +		ret = env_set("zynqmp_auth", "0");
Could use a more descriptive name, like fsbl_auth?

> +		if (ret)
> +			return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> +		
> +	}
> +
> +	return status;
Should it be CMD_RET_SUCCESS?

Thanks,
Tomas


> +}
> +
>  static struct cmd_tbl cmd_zynqmp_sub[] = {
>  	U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(secure, 5, 0, do_zynqmp_verify_secure, "", ""),
>  	U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(pmufw, 4, 0, do_zynqmp_pmufw, "", ""),
> @@ -371,6 +410,7 @@ static struct cmd_tbl cmd_zynqmp_sub[] = {
>  	U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(rsa, 7, 0, do_zynqmp_rsa, "", ""),
>  	U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(sha3, 5, 0, do_zynqmp_sha3, "", ""),
>  	U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(reboot, 3, 0, do_zynqmp_reboot, "", ""),
> +	U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(verify_auth, 2, 0, do_zynqmp_verify_auth, "", ""),
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEFINE_TCM_OCM_MMAP
>  	U_BOOT_CMD_MKENT(tcminit, 3, 0, do_zynqmp_tcm_init, "", ""),
>  #endif
> @@ -446,10 +486,12 @@ U_BOOT_LONGHELP(zynqmp,
>  	"	48 bytes hash value into srcaddr\n"
>  	"	Optional key_addr can be specified for saving sha3 hash value\n"
>  	"	Note: srcaddr/srclen should not be 0\n"
> +	"zynqmp verify_auth - verifies if boot.bin was authenticated\n"
> +	"	Returns: 0 not authenticated, 1 authenticated\n"
>  	);
>  
>  U_BOOT_CMD(
> -	zynqmp, 9, 1, do_zynqmp,
> +	zynqmp, 10, 1, do_zynqmp,
>  	"ZynqMP sub-system",
>  	zynqmp_help_text
>  );



More information about the U-Boot mailing list