[PATCH v1] mmc: sdhci-cadence6: Fix the license to GPL-2.0+

[Tanmay Kathpalia]

Hi Quentin, Hal

Thank you for including me in the discussion.

On 1/12/2026 3:11 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Hal,
> 
> On 1/12/26 3:39 AM, Hal Feng wrote:
>> The license of the file is not valid. Fix it to GPL-2.0+.
>>
> 
> This matches the license used in the header file added in the same 
> commit (see Fixes trailer).
> 
>> Fixes: fe11aa0b8ca3 ("mmc: sdhci-cadence: Add support for Cadence 
>> sdmmc v6")
>> Reported-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at cherry.de>
>> Reported-by: oliver Fendt <ofendt at googlemail.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ 
>> CAFoF8fC4foffYJgYm9CkViET83gDu05noVRxLxgs+KWXN_-LBQ at mail.gmail.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng at starfivetech.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mmc/sdhci-cadence6.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/sdhci-cadence6.c b/drivers/mmc/sdhci-cadence6.c
>> index 91a245aa490..ca1086e2359 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/sdhci-cadence6.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/sdhci-cadence6.c
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-platform_driver
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> 
> Would have preferred the canonical version (GPL-2.0-or-later) but that's 
> good enough here.
> 
> IANAL, so I don't know if we need approval from all contributors to the 
> file. Fortunately, there's only been one outside of the two starfivetech 
> contributors (whose mails bounce), so adding this contributor (Tanmay 
> Kathpalia) in Cc so they can just provide their Acked-by/Reviewed-by so 
> we don't have to find out.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at cherry.de>
> 
> Thanks!
> Quentin


Reviewed-by: Tanmay Kathpalia <tanmay.kathpalia at altera.com>

Regards,
Tanmay