[PATCH v3] mkimage: Default to 8-byte alignment for DTBs added via -b argument
Marek Vasut
marek.vasut at mailbox.org
Tue Jan 27 20:13:44 CET 2026
On 1/27/26 8:04 PM, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 1/27/26 13:52, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 1/27/26 5:38 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>>>> No, the check in fdt_getprop is only for the name, not the value (which
>>>> could be arbitrary binary data including many nul bytes).
>>>>
>>>> I think the assumption in most of U-Boot is that the provided FDT is
>>>> trusted (or at least not maliciously ill-formed). functions like
>>>> image_get_checksum_algo read up to 6 bytes beyond full_name if full_name
>>>> == "". It's possible to read off the end of the DTB if this is the very
>>>> last string in the strings block and there is no trailing padding. If
>>>> we're really concerned about this (e.g. to avoid false-positives with
>>>> ASAN), then we should just add (say) 16 bytes to the end of every DTB
>>>> when we malloc it.
>>>
>>> Yes, we rely on the sanity checking in libfdt, which I think the kernel
>>> also does.
>>>
>>> And no, I'm not sure if we care enough about all of these corner cases,
>>> but if we do then I'm not sure this right here and now is where to
>>> start. It should start with upstream libfdt to see whatever cases aren't
>>> handled, and then what cases fall on the callers to deal with wrt
>>> security implications.
>>>
>>> Because I really, really, really, do not want to block fixing booting on
>>> some large number of boards because now we're going to depend first on a
>>> security audit here.
>> So back to my and Sean suggestion:
>>
>> fdt_string_eq_() does effectively memcmp():
>>
>> return p && (slen == len) && (memcmp(p, s, len) == 0);
>>
>> So do this and be done with it ?
>>
>> type = fdt_getprop(fdt, node, FIT_TYPE_PROP, &len);
>> if (type && len == strlen(FIT_TYPE_PROP) && !memcmp(type, "flat_dt", len))
>
> this is wrong it needs to be
>
> type && len == sizeof("flat_dt") && !memcmp(type, "flat_dt", len)
... because ... ?
> and it's exactly the sort of error I was complaining about earlier :)
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list