[PATCH] fit: Rework SPL_LOAD_FIT_ADDRESS slightly

[Tom Rini]

On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 13:56:10 -0600, Tom Rini wrote:

> Options which deal with memory locations and have a default value of 0x0
> are dangerous, as that is often not a valid memory location. Rework
> SPL_LOAD_FIT_ADDRESS as follows:
> - Add SPL_HAS_LOAD_FIT_ADDRESS to guard prompting the question as the
>   case of loading a FIT image does not strictly require setting an
>   address and allows for a malloc()'d area to be used.
> - For SPL_RAM_SUPPORT, select the new guard symbol if SPL_LOAD_FIT is
>   enabled because in that case an address must be provided.
> - Update defconfigs for these new changes. Largely this means some
>   defconfigs need to enable SPL_HAS_LOAD_FIT_ADDRESS to maintain their
>   current status. In the case of sandbox, we also need to set
>   SPL_LOAD_FIT_ADDRESS to 0x0.
> 
> [...]

Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!

[1/1] fit: Rework SPL_LOAD_FIT_ADDRESS slightly
      commit: 272b8784faf33b0eded27ba78ad4251151ef357b
-- 
Tom