[PATCH] stm32mp1: use debug() for image entry point message
Patrice CHOTARD
patrice.chotard at foss.st.com
Fri Jul 3 14:46:14 CEST 2026
On 6/25/26 14:33, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 6/25/26 8:31 AM, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/18/26 11:29, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
>>> The stm32mp1 specific code prints the image entry point unconditionally
>>> before jumping to the next-stage image, unlike the generic SPL
>>> implementation in common/spl/spl.c.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean at geanix.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/stm32mp1/cpu.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/stm32mp1/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/stm32mp1/cpu.c
>>> index 252aef1852e..ea5d8a648df 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/stm32mp1/cpu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/stm32mp1/cpu.c
>>> @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ void __noreturn jump_to_image(struct spl_image_info *spl_image)
>>> image_entry_stm32_t image_entry =
>>> (image_entry_stm32_t)spl_image->entry_point;
>>> - printf("image entry point: 0x%lx\n", spl_image->entry_point);
>>> + debug("image entry point: 0x%lx\n", spl_image->entry_point);
>>> image_entry(romapi);
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>
>> + Marek, as he is the author of the path which brang jump_to_image()
>>
>> Personally i don't mind of usage either printk() or debug().
>> Marek, what do you prefer ?
> debug() is fine, thanks !
Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard at foss.st.com>
Thanks
Patrice
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list