[PATCH v3 00/15] rockchip: Add support for the RV1103B, RV1103 and RV1106

[Simon Glass]

Hi Tom,

On Wed, 8 Jul 2026 at 18:38, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 04:36:57PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 at 09:35, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 09:30:58AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > > This series adds support for three small Rockchip camera SoCs and two
> > > > boards which use them.
> > > >
> > > > The first eight patches are Fabio Estevam's series adding the RV1103B
> > > > and the Onion Omega4 board, updated here to address the review
> > > > comments on v2: the board patch is split into SoC and board patches,
> > > > the devicetree files move into the patches where they belong and the
> > > > pinctrl driver uses regmap_update_bits() throughout. All credit for
> > > > this work goes to Fabio. The devicetree concern raised in the v2
> > > > review is also resolved now: the devicetree files carried here are the
> > > > versions merged in Linux v7.1, verbatim, and can be dropped once the
> > > > next dts/upstream sync brings them in.
> > > >
> > > > The remaining patches add the RV1106 and its RV1103 package variant,
> > > > following the same structure as the RV1103B patches, together with
> > > > the Luckfox Pico Mini B board. These SoCs have no mainline Linux
> > > > support yet, so their devicetrees are local for now. The clock and
> > > > pinctrl drivers are ported from the Rockchip vendor tree and are the
> > > > work of Elaine Zhang and Ye Zhang. The final patch makes the
> > > > maskrom-mode RAM-boot images work on 32-bit boards without OP-TEE,
> > > > which both of these boards rely on.
> > > >
> > > > Tested on the Luckfox Pico Mini B: U-Boot runs from RAM over the USB
> > > > maskrom path and both the SPI NAND and a microSD card are usable. THe
> > > > board is running in my lab.
> > >
> > > I did ask you not to do this, Simon, as your patches aren't being picked
> > > up until we've resolved the status of u-boot.org.
> >
> > I just saw that email Tom...OK, so I should not send any patches at all?
>
> As I told you on the community call over two weeks ago now, I'm not
> comfortable taking your patches until we have resolved the u-boot.org
> domain transfer. So no, your patches are not being merged.

Do you mean:

- still send patches, they might be reviewed but will not be merged
until we resolve the Concept tree / domain
- stop sending patches completely

Regards,
Simon